Archive for the ‘Homeschooling’ Category

Throwing the Baby Out With the Macroevolutionary Bathwater

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

Great post over at TakiMag concerning the self-defeating efforts of conservatives to dismiss Darwin’s insights:

I too am often disappointed that pundits on the pseudo-Right seek to undermine an insight that could strengthen their alleged worldview.  It’s no surprise that lurking below Intelligent Design there is an appeal to a form of universalism (and all its attendant condemnations), not unlike pro-life activists invoking civil-rights rhetoric and modern Christians championing universal human rights.

http://www.takimag.com/sniperstower/art … tionalism/

The fact that some extreme atheists use Darwinism as a sort of religion to explain ultimate origins does not excuse Christians who invoke the equally atheistic spirit of the French Revolution to attack it.  Both are lies.  And as I’ve pointed out before, all of the practical, political implications of Darwinism are microevolutionary in nature:

2008/12/13/intelligent-design-vs-evolution-a-conclusion/

When poor people with two-digit IQ’s are given the right to immigrate and vote on politicians who then decide how to tax the greater property and income of those with three-digit IQ’s, whom they outnumber, democracy becomes a farce of two wolves voting themselves a lamb for dinner.  When those differences are largely genetic and intractable, and those with less wealth have higher birthrates, we have a recipe for a very unstable society, on its way to the logical progression of multiculturalism: from the First World to crony-corrupt Mexico, from Mexico to racial-socialist Venezuela, from Venezuela to the affirmative-action-state (and world rape capital) of South Africa, from South Africa to the lawless murders, rapes, stealing and mass inflation of Zimbabwe, and from Zimbabwe to the permanent abyss of Haiti.

But hey, it feels good to rant about Hitler and Darwin, right?

The Risks of Affluence

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

A decent article summarizing some important statistics if you ignore the psychobabble:

http://www.northshoremag.com/cgi-bin/ns … leged.html

Key takeaways:

1. Avoid affluent private schools after sixth grade.  I personally think a hybrid plan of private elementary school, homeschooled junior high and public high school (in a safe school district) is the next-best alternative to 100% homeschooling.

2. Don’t allow your kids to use a huge house as a means of escaping from the family, or vice versa for the family.  A smaller home is a healthier home in general.  I would also advocate eliminating single-occupant bedrooms if possible no matter how large the house (i.e. have fewer private areas and more common areas for activities; have a gameroom instead of a teenager’s own bedroom).  No Internet, no TV outside of public areas, under strict parental controls.

3. Don’t get over-involved in your kids’ activities and limit the number of adult-supervised formal things they do so they have more time for work around the house (or other genuine contributions to the family) and free play.

4. Don’t go buy your kids a bunch of “gear” for an activity they show interest in.  Make them buy their own gear or just buy a standard, not premium, level of quality.

5. If you have service providers like house cleaners, yard cutters, etc, reduce these in favor of child labor as soon as practically possible.

Key quotes:

Research shows that up to about seventh grade, affluence is a predictor of greater well-being. But after that point, Rampage says, the tide turns, and it becomes a predictor for increased problems. One-fifth of affluent 10th-grade girls experience significant depression. “That’s three times the national average,” Rampage says. “Affluent boys are 35 percent more likely than boys from poor or modest backgrounds to abuse alcohol, and popular boys from prosperous homes are at the greatest risk of all for substance abuse.”

In fact, the wealthier the child, the more likely to feel estranged. This matters because the best predictor for healthy adjustment is closeness to one’s parents, and the reverse is a warning sign for drug and alcohol use, anxiety and depression. And when these problems emerge in high school they may predict a lifelong vulnerability in adulthood.

One way that affluence plays a part, Rampage says, is that “closeness” has a literal component. A less-prosperous family usually shares a smaller space. Parents can see or hear when a child is upset or sad. Children can tell when their parents are worried and have a better sense of their family’s problems. The child is more likely to contribute, and the child’s contributions are more likely to be valued, which creates a sense of worth and responsibility.

Cutting Caffeine

Sunday, August 10th, 2008

I like caffeine so much that I know I would like nicotine, even though I’ve never had it.  That’s why I can never try it.

This last week I cut my caffeine intake by about four-fifths (my former intake was 1 cup of strong coffee and 1 coke, supplemented some days by another cup or iced tea).  It was painful, but worth it.  The way my mind works, somewhat nervous and anxious already, does not need additional stimulation.  God gave me my own internal caffeine that should not be enhanced.

Caffeine, I read, increases stress hormones among its effects.  Now, I find myself doing more to actually address sources of stress than feeling stress itself.  And fewer stress hormones also means better control over the appetite, which is stimulated by cortisol, adrenaline, and the like.

If you have a nervous or anxious personality, try to cut down the caffeine and see how you feel.

Those Mormon Kids

Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008

I feel really torn over the Mormon sect out in San Angelo. On the one hand, I recoil at the thought of the government taking kids away from their parents. Their practice of polygamy and teen marriage is deplorable, but it’s not acute child abuse so much as it is a warped alternative culture. What bothers me is how this is portrayed in the media, as they harp on the fact the kids wear modest clothes, don’t watch television, don’t eat junk food, are homeschooled and are polite. I think they’re pulling a guilt-by-association to smear homeschoolers in general.

And I do have a natural loathing of Child Protective Services, and all the little tyrant social workers who in their heart of hearts hate parents with a traditional view of childrearing and family, eager for the least reason to use the guns of the state to remove children from homes they deem “abusive” because they have the wrong political views. And now we learn that the whole raid was triggered by a fake abuse claim, yet they still keep the kids.

But at the same time state governments have been dealing with various sects of polygamous Mormons for over a hundred years, and they simply violate Western norms of society to such a high degree that their tolerance is impossible. But, really, they aren’t doing anything that wasn’t done in the Old Testament by Abraham or others that we admire. They’re wrong of course to do so, but still.

We’re talking about people of essentially Scandinavian descent (Mormons pull from the same high-latitude stock as the Quakers historically) with all the discipline, fertility and extended kinship solidarity of Muslims. If allowed to grow, they might be unstoppable.

Huckabee’s Anti-Homeschooling Record

Monday, November 5th, 2007

This expose’ of Huckabee leading Arkansas to become the first state to REDUCE homeschooling freedom (against the national trend of homeschool legalization) might be of interest to some of my readers:

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/homeschooler … andidates/

http://www.hslda.org/courtreport/v15n3/ … endly=True

First Huckabee signs a law helping homeschoolers, then signs a law further restricting them.  Changing one’s mind on critical issues based on which way the political winds are blowing?  Does this remind us of another Arkansas politician?
Consequences of Huckabee’s law:

Arkansas is now one of only 12 states to impose a deadline for beginning home schooling or requiring parents to provide advance notice to public school officials of their decision to do so. Because of this restriction, parents who encounter intolerable conditions at the public school, such as imminent danger to the safety or welfare of their child, will have to wait at least 14 days before withdrawing the child to begin home schooling or else face truancy charges for unexcused absences during the 14-day waiting period. No such restriction exists for parents who decide to immediately remove their children to attend a private or parochial school in Arkansas. This raises serious issues regarding the right of parents to direct the education of their children and equal protection of the law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Another discriminatory provision in H.B. 1724 states that any home schooling student who refuses to participate in the state testing program shall be subject to prosecution for truancy. Public school students refusing to participate in state testing would not be subject to truancy prosecution.

Prior law required parents moving into the state mid-school year to provide a written notice of intent to the local superintendent within 30 days. The new law requires parents to provide a written notice upon moving into a different school district during the school year, even though notice was given in their former district.

If you think Huckabee is the solution to the four frauds they call frontrunners, you could be making a big mistake. Huckabee seems a lot more like that other slimy governor of Arkansas politically than a true conservative, even if (as far as we know) he doesn’t share his personal problems. Seriously, I think I’d rather have the Mormon than this guy. At least you know he’s phony, while Huckabee has this uncanny ability to seem genuine: what did I say about that other Arkansas governor?

Ron Paul, of course, is the obvious choice for homeschoolers, being the only Republican, besides Tancredo, in the race who opposes and voted against No Child Left Behind, Bush’s insane big-government bill proposing “solutions” based on fraudulent test results in Houston public schools.

Christianity and Culture, Part Four: Practical Suggestions

Sunday, January 7th, 2007

This series has discussed the legitimacy, primacy, biological reality and even Scriptural authority for a positive loyalty and preference for the ethnocultural group in which God in His Sovereignty has placed us. As Americans, our loyalty is not to a mere “American creed” or set of abstract principles theoretically extendable to all mankind, but rather to the actual, physical American people as they existed historically and their descendents today. Our heritage as Americans is not due to our Constitution (Liberia has an almost identical Constitution, but it’s not somewhere you would want to live) but rather due to our innate biocultural capabilities combined with a historical legacy as a colony of 17th century England and the attendant conservatism of a remote colony in preserving the virtues of that era, certainly not perfect but much superior in any moral or religious measure to our current age.

Yet many of us are hesitant to express this loyalty. Why? Because of an oppressive force generally known as “political correctness”. Hispanic groups can tell us to “go back to Europe” with no media backlash. Black Muslims like Louis Farrakhan claim European peoples are the invention of a black mad scientist sequestered on a remote island who created “blue-eyed devils” as the tools of Satan; and yet, it is only Farrakhan’s wacky theories about Jews that get media attention, while his anti-European views are tolerated. But let our people ask the government to merely enforce its own laws to prevent an alien invasion and their eventual displacement, and the media censors immediately begin the predictable cry of “racist, bigot, xenophobe”. Why the double standard?

Perhaps Moses said it best, in a speech Charlton Heston gave in 1997 to the Free Congress Foundation:

I have come to realize that a cultural war is raging across our land… storming our values, assaulting our freedoms, killing our self-confidence in who we are and what we believe, where we come from.

How many of you here own a gun? A show of hands?

How many own two or more guns?

Thank you. I wonder—how many of you in this room own guns but chose not to raise your hand?

How many of you considered revealing your conviction about a constitutional right, but then thought better of it?

Then you are a victim of the cultural war. You are a casualty of the cultural warfare being waged against traditional American freedom of beliefs and ideas. Now maybe you don’t care one way or the other about owning a gun. But I could’ve asked for a show of hands on Pentecostal Christians, or pro-lifers, or right-to-workers, or Promise Keepers, or school voucher-ers, and the result would be the same. What if the same question were asked at your PTA meeting? Would you raise your hand if Dan Rather were in the back of the room there with a film crew?

See? Good. Still, if you didn’t, you have been assaulted and robbed of the courage of your convictions. Your pride in who you are, and what you believe, has been ridiculed, ransacked, plundered. It may be a war without bullet or bloodshed, but with just as much liberty lost: You and your country are less free.

And you are not inconsequential people! You in this room, whom many would say are among the most powerful people on earth, you are shamed into silence! Because you embrace a view at odds with the cultural warlords. If that is the outcome of cultural war, and you are the victims, I can only ask the gravely obvious question: What’ll become of the right itself? Or other rights not deemed acceptable by the thought police? What other truth in your heart will you disavow with your hand?

I remember when European Jews feared to admit their faith. The Nazis forced them to wear six-pointed yellow stars sewn on their chests as identity badges. It worked. So—what color star will they pin on our coats? How will the self-styled elite tag us? There may not be a Gestapo officer on every street corner yet, but the influence on our culture is just as pervasive.

Now, I am not really here to talk about the Second Amendment or the NRA, but the gun issue clearly brings into focus the war that’s going on.

Rank-and-file Americans wake up every morning, increasingly bewildered and confused at why their views make them lesser citizens. After enough breakfast-table TV promos hyping tattooed sex-slaves on the next Rikki Lake show, enough gun-glutted movies and tabloid talk shows, enough revisionist history books and prime-time ridicule of religion, enough of the TV anchor who cocks her pretty head, clucks her tongue and sighs about guns causing crime and finally the message gets through: Heaven help the God-fearing, law-abiding, Caucasian, middle class, Protestant, or—even worse—Evangelical Christian, Midwest, or Southern, or—even worse—rural, apparently straight, or—even worse—admittedly heterosexual, gun-owning or—even worse—NRA-card-carrying, average working stiff, or—even worse—male working stiff, because not only don’t you count, you’re a downright obstacle to social progress. Your tax dollars may be just as delightfully green as you hand them over, but your voice requires a lower decibel level, your opinion is less enlightened, your media access is insignificant, and frankly mister, you need to wake up, wise up and learn a little something about your new America…in fact, why don’t you just sit down and shut up?

That’s why you don’t raise your hand. That’s how cultural war works. And you are losing.

Although my years are long, I was not on hand to help pen the Bill of Rights. And popular assumptions aside, the same goes for the Ten Commandments. Yet as an American and as a man who believes in God’s almighty power, I treasure both.

The Constitution was handed down to guide us by a bunch of those wise old dead white guys who invented this country. Now, some flinch when I say that. Why? It’s true…they were white guys. So were most of the guys who died in Lincoln’s name opposing slavery in the 1860s. So why should I be ashamed of white guys? Why is “Hispanic pride” or “black pride” a good thing, while “white pride” conjures up shaved heads and white hoods? Why was the Million Man March on Washington celebrated in the media as progress, while the Promise Keepers March on Washington was greeted with suspicion and ridicule? I’ll tell you why: Cultural warfare.

Americans should not have to go to war every morning for their values. They already go to war for their families. They fight to hold down a job, raise responsible kids, make their payments, keep gas in the car, put food on the table and clothes on their backs, and still save a little for their final days in dignity. They prefer the America they built – where you could pray without feeling naive, love without being kinky, sing without profanity, be white without feeling guilty, own a gun without shame, and raise your hand without apology. They are the critical masses who find themselves under siege and are long for you to get some guts, stand on principle and lead them to victory in this cultural war.

Now all this sounds a little Mosaic, the punch-line of my sermon is as elementary as the Golden Rule. In a cultural war, triumph belongs to those who arm themselves with pride in who they are and then do the right thing. Not the most expedient thing, not the politically correct thing, not what’ll sell, but the right thing.

As an aside, I find it interesting that Heston brings up the Promise Keepers march on Washington. Indeed it was ridiculed by the media, in cruel ways, stereotyping a gathering of Christian men as just a bunch of dorky white guys wanting to beat their wives into submission. While I have my own reservations about Promise Keepers leadership that I won’t go into here, the instincts of the participants are commendable: men wanting to turn their hearts towards home. I remember watching the march on C-SPAN, and there was one particular part that turned my stomach: a bizarre ritual of “racial reconciliation” that involved a white guy on his knees, surrounded by representatives of other races (complete with an American Indian in full headdress, looking more like The Village People than any Indian you see in real life these days) who were standing around him, while the white guy prayed for God’s forgiveness for the sins of his race in America against Hispanics, Indians and African Americans. But it was the white guy and the white guy only who prayed for forgiveness- no prayer of forgiveness for Mexican slaughters of Anglos at Goliad and the Alamo, no prayer of forgiveness for the thousands of women and children mercilessly murdered by American Indians, and no prayer of forgiveness for African Americans’ disproportionate interracial crime rates. I will restrain myself from describing the myriad theological problems with the whole episode.

This incident is exactly the phenomenon Heston hit on- the cloud of oppression where we want to please the media and the cultural elites with apologies for who we are. And yet, what did this ritual buy the Promise Keepers leadership, who were obviously nervous about the fact that their openly multiracial group overwhelmingly consisted of white men? It only bought them contempt from the media. We must realize that our enemies can never be placated or pleased- but like a battered woman in a co-dependent relationship, Promise Keepers keeps on believing they can somehow justify themselves by trying to please the media.

In his speech, Moses was describing the cultural war, but specifically a psychological war, the dirtiest kind of war that deprives men and women of the sanctity of their own thoughts and opinions. And there we see the practical task before us: Like a Twelve-Step Program, we must admit and recognize that we are victims of this war, seek to rehabilitate ourselves from its effect, and most importantly, shield our children from it in their formative years and give them a cultural immune system that will enable them to fight off psychological pathogens once they enter the outside world on their own.

Once freed from the psychological disease of political correctness, the ethnocultural loyalties I advocate will occur naturally, or at least can be taught and internalized with little resistance as a logical extension of the family itself.

So, without further ado:

Tom’s Practical Suggestions for Recovering Victims of Political Correctness to Heal Psychological Wounds and Break the Cycle of Guilt and Oppression for Your Children

1. The media’s main distribution vehicle for mass-consumed politically correct propaganda is television. Turn off the TV. Cancel the cable. Your cable bill sends about 25 to 50 cents per month to every channel on the dial, whether you watch it or not. So you’re subsidizing the filth whether you want to or not. There’s not a whole lot of downside to getting rid of cable once you get over withdrawals: higher quality family time without the tube on all the time (I’ve noticed some people who mute the TV and leave it on all the time, like a security blanket or something), higher SAT scores for your kids since they’ll have to read for entertainment, and more sex. Seriously, studies have shown that TV’s in the bedroom reduce sex frequency between husbands and wives.

2. Ok, I realize most of you won’t implement #1. I’m a hypocrite as well on it, but I thought I’d throw it out there as an ideal. Here’s what we did: we cancelled our cable in 2005. We signed up with Dish Network; there’s even a “family friendly” package that is $20 a month (though not all of the channels, like Nickelodeon, are necessarily healthy). We also got a DVR, where we record shows like a TIVO. Second, and most importantly, we put the Dish Netword receiver on one and only one TV: the one right in front of our exercise equipment. In our house, you must at least be building your temple while you rot your mind.

3. Ok, so maybe #2 is not something you want to do either. At least do the following. Get a DVR, whether Dish or Tivo or whatever. I think a lot of our consumption of unhealthy propaganda is due to mindless viewing of whatever’s on. Now, most people don’t want to watch propaganda, but they will watch it if it’s the best thing on at any given time. A Tivo or digital video recorder allows you to record hours and hours of relatively harmless content (like my wife’s decorating shows, or my shows about “Modern Marvels”, exciting documentaries about concrete, plastic, metal and the like). My recorder has more shows of pretty harmless content than my wife or I could ever watch. In addition, you can skip commercials pretty easily, which will reduce your credit card bill by reducing your exposure to want-inducing messages of materialism (believe me, advertising works- I spend a lot of money on it, and not for my health). Now remember, I said the content is relatively harmless, but it’s not edifying either. So instead of consuming media toxins, you are now consuming the equivalent of table sugar, not healthy for sure, but not harmful in moderation. Even some of the “harmless” content will have trace levels of toxin- for example, a documentary about Texas had the obligatory politically correct hand-wringing about slavery. At least in that situation, with a DVR, you can hit the pause button, explain to your children the problem with what they just heard, and start again. If we talk back to our TV’s in our children’s prescence, the damage is mitigated; in fact, being a critical consumer of media content is an important skill to teach to our children.

4. Never, ever let your children watch content from television without your supervision. Even with a DVR, your children may be tempted to watch the commercials. And for goodness sake, don’t let them watch “children’s” programming. Media mogul Sumner Redstone, born Murray Rothstein, owns Viacom, which in turn owns Cartoon Network, Nickelodeon and MTV. Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network are designed to produce future consumers of MTV. Do not be so gullible as to trust an anti-Christian corporation to determine appropriate media content for your children. Your preferred medium for children’s content should be the DVD, where you are in absolute control of a closed circuit on the content. There’s no way they’re going to see a Spongebob commercial while watching Veggietales.

5. Build an extensive DVD collection of healthy content and share your content with others (I leave the means for the latter deliberately vague). I will soon start a project of building a list of appropriate DVD’s on this site.

6. Much of the “science” of psychology is actually pseudoscience. However, there is one psychological therapy technique that is almost universally useful: exposure therapy for curing phobias. If someone is afraid of snakes, they can be cured by handling snakes, almost guaranteed. Similarly, political correctness has made us afraid of our past as a people and culture. We need to dig around in the past, particularly in those areas deemed “forbidden” and “evil” by the media, to discover the truth. As a Southerner, this means, for example, I need to know everything I can about The War Between the States, Reconstruction and the Redemption (i.e. the overthrow of the Reconstruction governments) that I can, from original sources, or at least older sources. I need to know the past as it was, from the people who lived in it, and not from self-appointed censors in our current age.

7. We need a general exposure to our civilization’s heritage. Read good literature, listen to good classical music, and enjoy poetry from the past when poems were real art instead of self-indulgent raw feeds of randomness and obscenity from some idiot’s subconscious.

8. In regards to #6 and #7, it is apparent that we must read to accomplish these things. In music and reading, there is a somewhat painful process of stretching the mind that is required before finer things can be appreciated. It’s worth it. Once you begin to enjoy the “higher bandwidth” cultural offerings of our past, you’ll feel like something’s missing in mass-marketed media. But it does take some effort to read. I will also start media lists of music and books on this site. My own experience reading good books is fairly recent, so I can offer some suggestions.

9. In the blog format, one experiential thing I can do for my audience appropriate to the blogging medium to help with #6 and #7 is featuring poetry and prose excerpts from the past. The Internet is perfect for short-format poems- I will begin a weekly poem and prose feature soon, with poems and excerpts from important historical works that will help recovering victims of political correctness.

10. If you’re homeschooling your children, be careful with your curriculum. As anything you pick will be superior to most private and public schools, do not let that comfort blind you to the opportunity cost if a curriculum relies on a pre-digested textbook format to teach history, music, art and the like. I notice some of the large homeschool curriculum sources making overtures to multiculturalism, which is almost as destructive in a Christian context as a secular one. We should prefer a curriculum that is heavy on original sources instead of “interpretation” in a textbook written under the political pressure of our time. Older textbooks are preferable to newer ones. I believe our children have a lot of “heavy lifting” to do in restoring our civilization, and only a fully confident worldview in their culture, people, faith and family will give them the intestinal fortitude to do whatever is necessary in the face of our politically correct opposition.

I’m sure there are more suggestions than these, but I will stop at ten and discuss additional ideas in additional posts.

The Micro-Evolutionary Force of Contraception

Tuesday, November 14th, 2006

A friend of mine has a theory about the long-range effects of massive contraception and low fertility. Basically, he thinks that people who don’t naturally like children are going to have their genes eliminated from the future of humanity.

It makes sense- many psychological traits are genetic, and “degree of liking children” is likely at least partially genetic. Before contraception, the only thing required to procreate was to enjoy sex. Now, you have to enjoy children as well, since you can separate the former from the latter.

This seems to be the case- I was researching the Robinson curriculum recently for homeschooling, and I noticed that Robinson has some odd ways of caring for his kids. Notably, he never leaves them with anyone or a babysitter, presumably out of some sort of worry that someone else can’t take care of them even for a little while- he claims his children are always with him.

Now that’s someone who enjoys children, to the point of extremity- Robinson is a widower with six children. And his genes will be well-represented in the next generation.

I’ll add my own corollary to my friend’s hypothesis: the future will be composed of the descendants of those individuals who tend to like children OR tend to be too stupid, apathetic or incompetent to use birth control properly. Many Christians like to pretend otherwise, but on the other side of the bell curve there are a lot of people who can’t handle taking a pill everyday, whose procreation patterns more resemble cats than humans.

So we’ll have a child-obsessed homeschooling high-fertility overclass with a massive high-fertility low-IQ underclass. Should be interesting to see what happens when the two groups collide politically.

Literacy and Paradise Lost

Friday, October 20th, 2006

On the last two road trips my family has taken, we have attempted (when not distracted by children’s needs, thank goodness for steering-wheel audio controls to pause and play) to listen to audiobooks of classic literature. The first one was The Hound of the Baskervilles, the most famous Sherlock Holmes novel by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. The second, for the trip we took this weekend, was Paradise Lost by John Milton (if you follow this link, disregard the modern “reinterpretations” of the work), written in the 1600’s. It is an epic poem dramatizing Satan’s war against God in heaven, his casting into hell and finally the temptation of Adam and Eve- 9 CD’s worth.

The thing I most felt while listening to the first CD was an awareness of my own lack of literacy compared to the norm during the height of our civilization and before our own degraded age. The density and content of the poem coming out of the speakers was almost more than my brain could process- ideas upon ideas layered so thick and quick it took my whole brain to process just some of them before yet another line was read.

From my experiences reading ANY document over 100 years old, whether Holmes or Milton or the Federalist Papers- all documents meant for wide public consumption- it is clear that the average illiterate person then (who lacked the technical skill to read and write) was probably more literate in their thoughts than the average “literate” person today who has been taught enough phonics to digest People Magazine.

Lack of literacy really means an inability to express ideas precisely, both externally AND internally. The lack of an ability to think precisely weakens the reasonable, rational parts of our nature and makes us more susceptible to those parts more apt to make foolish decisions.

Yet many Christian leaders see no value in literacy, and mock those who see it as a necessary prerequisite to truly understanding God’s Word. So we continue to dumb down church, dumb down the Bible into sixth-grade level paraphrases that cannot possibly contain all of the original meaning, and dumb down our culture and people.

Yet a great hope lies ahead- as more fathers and families take charge of their family’s education (through whatever means, but primarily through homeschooling), a great literary renewal should happen among our people. Did you hear the one about the homeschooled kids who took down the Ivy League in moot court competition?

Why Homeschool? Let’s be practical…

Sunday, October 1st, 2006

Someone recently asked for reasons why people are homeschooling.

I should first note that the following is my opinion in the abstract and not a criticism of any particular individual.

So why homeschool? I would only answer this question with a view to maximizing the probability that someone “on the fence” about homeschooling would choose it. There are so many practical benefits (time, efficiency, cost, moral/spiritual development, superior academics = higher SAT score = better college/career and higher lifetime earnings) that I see no need to spiritualize the argument. Homeschooling is basically a long-term investment with a very attractive return. Helping people see the returns is more effective than brow-beating them with one’s personal convictions.

One of my primary reasons is one of heritage, of giving my children a sense of continuity with the past and the future of their family and civilization.

The sad reality is that almost all otherwise academically rigorous schools, public or private, will teach a version of history that will demean the ancestors of my children and the civilization they created (for example, due to the presence in our schools of Mexican loyalists who object to the very idea of Texas as “racist”, many schools no longer glorify the heroes of San Jacinto who defeated the tyrant Santa Anna).

Orwell said that he who controls the past controls the future, and he who controls the present controls the past. I want to control the “present” for my children and especially their perception of who they are and where they came from. Much of the weakness of Christendom today (as compared to the passionate faith of Muslims) is related to our perception that our ancestors were somehow morally lacking as they conquered, civilized and Christianized much of the world. Homeschooling provides an opportunity to help your kids escape the oppressive guilt that our society seeks to instill in them simply because of who they are. I believe only a generation raised with moral confidence in their heritage can do the heavy lifting required to restore our once great civilization.

My second reason would be allowing my children to skip the entirely unnecessary “teenager” culture and phase of life (which now starts younger and younger as advertisers seek to sexualize children), which is artificial and has no historical basis. I want to spare them the awkwardness and stupidness of a culture that promotes wasteful and self-destructive behavior. Throughout history, teenagers were capable of many great deeds- like being mother and father to God Himself. If children are able to start their adult life at 14 or 15 instead of spending ten years in a “second toddlerhood” then they will be far ahead of their peers in maturity and experience throughout life. All we really have is our life, and what a blessing to allow our children to experience REAL life (outside of the teenage ghetto, no pun intended) ten years ahead of time. Imagine having the wisdom of 40 at the age of 30- their youth will not be as wasted while they are still young.

That’s the positive side- but avoiding evil is just as important as positive good. I don’t think many parents have any idea what the teen culture today is really like. I grew up in kind of a backwater, so my teenage experience ten years ago is probably fifteen to twenty years behind the current norm- and we’ve been compounding moral decline for fifty years now. So the other night on the way back from a fishing trip I decided to turn on a top 40 radio station, 94.1 for those in the area. I felt like I was literally in a foreign country- who are these people that listen to such obscenity? These people are the students at your local elementary, middle, and high schools who consume this cultural trash and the parents who provide the funds for them to do so. We are not living in the 50’s anymore, or even the 60’s, or even the 90’s for that matter. When the top ten “songs” are all amusical rhythmic variations on some 80-IQ felon’s idea of a good time sexually, in explicit detail, we are dealing with cultural botulism. Just as we would not eat food from a dented can (it’s probably ok after all, right?), I see no alternative but complete secession from the popular culture in the schools. It wants your son and your daughter. It wants them to be self-absorbed sex-crazed losers that exist only to consume their filthy entertainment. I think minimizing my children’s exposure to that culture through homeschooling is the only acceptable strategy for my family. Twenty years ago it might have been different, but not today.

Finally, a comment about socialization. I’m not sure where this universal concern started, but I have an idea. When you start researching homeschooling, you can’t help but notice that some of the folks who do it (and their kids) are a bit strange. Naturally, we assume this is because they homeschool. But if you look more closely, you’ll notice that the parents are weird even though the parents didn’t themselves necessarily homeschool. In other words, they and their kids aren’t weird because they homeschool, they are weird people with weird kids who happen to homeschool (weirdness, like so many other things, is probably genetic in origin). They don’t represent the majority of homeschoolers, but often through their behavior they make themselves more noticeable.

If you look at a fair sample instead of just the weirdos, I think you’ll find that homeschooled kids as a group are better-adjusted and better-socialized than their schooled counterparts. I can almost instantly pick out a homeschooled teen because of their ability to confidently and intelligently communicate with adults. Since they’ve had limited exposure to the loser culture of mainstream teens, they’ve never learned that being smart, positive and articulate is uncool. They’re budding well-adjusted adults, not sullen emotional train wrecks with a sense of entitlement.

Homeschooling has many benefits, and not homeschooling has many risks. I think if we would focus on these deliverables when talking with concerned parents, we will be more successful growing the total number of homeschoolers than if we use homeschooling as a prop to make ourselves feel morally superior.

I also think homeschooling is only practical for parents who have a certain minimum of intelligence, but this is a moot point for anyone taking the time to think about it carefully or who can read and comprehend this post. We are all high-investment parents with the ability to handle it academically.

And a final word for those thinking about it: the worst thing that could happen is that your child gets a second-rate education and has to work really hard in college to catch up. And that’s what they’ll get in most public schools anyway. I can’t count how many things I had to unlearn in my freshman year of college.