Archive for the ‘Christianity & the Church’ Category

Huckabee Is Finished

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

Mike Huckabee is a particular interest of mine.  He’s a man who encapsulates so much of what’s wrong with contemporary churches, politicians and the voters who elect them that it defies the imagination.  He’s a guy who’s just smart enough to be literate, but blessed with a charisma that makes him think he’s special and knows better than smarter people with their boring statistics, facts and logical arguments.  He goes with his heart, his gut, on everything (and thinks himself superior to others for doing so!) and his watered-down evangelical religion tells him his every first impression and instinct is actually one of the persons of God, the Holy Spirit.  It’s a black hole of pure unreflective ego.

One of Huckabee’s manifestations of this egoism was his massive pardoning of criminals in Arkansas whenever one of his Southern Baptist minister buddies told him that someone convicted of a crime deserved a second chance.  The thug who just killed four police officers in Seattle was one of them.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/20 … newsletter

Huckabee has proudly declared on many occasions that he disdains the separation of church and state, insisting that his strict Baptist piety should serve as the bedrock of public policy. Nowhere in his record as governor was the influence of religious zeal felt more heavily than in the distribution of pardons and commutations, as his own explanations have indicated. During those years he granted more commutations and pardons than any governor during the previous four decades, many of them surely justified as a response to excessive penalties under the state’s draconian narcotics laws. But others were deeply controversial, especially because so many of his acts of mercy appeared to depend on interventions by fellow Baptist preachers and by inmate professions of renewed Christian faith.

No doubt word spread among the prison population that the affable governor was vulnerable to appeals from convicts who claimed to be born again. Clemmons too was among those who benefited from Huckabee’s tendency to believe such pious testimonials. “I come from a very good Christian family and I was raised much better than my actions speak,” he explained in his clemency application in 2000. “I’m still ashamed to this day for the shame my stupid involvement in these crimes brought upon my family’s name … I have never done anything good for God, but I’ve prayed for him to grant me in his compassion the grace to make a start. Now, I’m humbly appealing to you for a brand new start.”

You have to hand it to George W. Bush when he was governor of Texas.  When Pat Robertson was begging him to pardon a photogenic, born-again female murderer on death row, he resisted and allowed justice to run its course.  He understood, perhaps because he was a less emotionally-driven Methodist, that God’s forgiveness must be independent of man’s justice (or maybe he just wanted to have a political future, which itself is more rational than Huckabee’s actions).  Otherwise you create feedback loops (like in the Arkansas prison system) where people start faking religious conversions to get out of jail.  You want honest, no-strings-attached conversions in prisons, not those linked to hopes of release.  Given the depravity of the human soul, you are more likely to send people to hell by pardoning them, because they may believe they have a genuine conversion when it’s really just motivated to save their skin.

Huckabee is basically self-righteous white trash.  This little anecdote conveys the essence of the man:

Saline County Circuit Judge Robert Herzfeld, who as a prosecutor successfully sued Huckabee over clemency practices, said Huckabee’s decision to give Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards a pardon for a 1975 traffic offense after meeting him at a concert showed how lightly the ex-governor approached the practice.

“That just said volumes about how he considered this serious ultimate power over freedom as a joke,” Herzfeld said.

Click here to see my full past coverage of Huckabee.

Tiller: A Plea for Tolerance and Compassion

Monday, June 1st, 2009

I think we can all agree that killing abortion doctors is always a tragedy.  I personally wish there were fewer abortion doctor killings and that every abortion doctor was a planned, wanted abortion doctor.  However, we should not judge those who have a different conviction, so that’s why I support the right to choose…it’s a choice no abortion doctor killer wants to make, but feels driven to out of desperation.  When will we take abortion doctor killings out of the back alley and ensure a safe, orderly environment in those cases where such a tragic choice may be felt to be necessary?

Perhaps if people were less judgmental about killing abortion doctors, and stopped demonizing abortion doctor killers, they would feel less marginalized and seek the help they need in the community.  We’re all human beings here, and no one has the right to judge…

Nothing to See Here

Friday, April 24th, 2009

Murdered Ukrainian Christians: 20,000,000

Hollywood Movies Depicting Their Struggle: 0

Number of States Requiring Mandatory Ukrainian Christian Holocaust Curriculum: 0

http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/Articl … 99,00.html

Taxes

Sunday, April 12th, 2009

Among some of my friends I have apparently earned a reputation of a tax protester of sorts, so I thought I should clarify my position.  My theological position on this, like so many things, is flexible in the specifics but clings to a absolute kernel of truth, ableit filtered through human error.  I am a weak theonomist I suppose, in that I see the tithe, at 10%, to be a reasonably realistic appraisal of a just rate of tax.  After all, it can’t be unjust, since God imposes it, and it is probably very nearly close to ideal since God is perfect.  This is the weak case, that taxes should be no more than around 10%.  The strong case is that God demands 10%, and so the state should demand much, much less, being much less than God.

It becomes clear at some point, I believe, that tax rates are fundamentally unjust when they get out of the neighborhood of 10%, that any takings beyond that are in violation of the higher law of self-preservation and providing for one’s family, and that men may band together and righteously resist such takings.  For the American colonists, who were of the strong anti-tax variety, this level was somewhere around 3%.

Now maybe one can argue that our economic excess production is so much higher due to the higher productivity of our economy that the government can take more without substantial harm to ourselves or our families.  But such a position also implies that the government owns us and our labor, that we are literally slaves whose production can be taken at will at our master’s pleasure.  But I will grant this as well: perhaps our mode of life is necessarily more complicated and more money is needed.  And I will reduce my claim of my right to resist to a doubling of God’s rate: the state may take 20% and no more, and perhaps I have no cause to complain, for blessed are the peacemakers who do not quarrel over small wrongs.

But whether you are as flexible as I am in allowing 20%, or share the fire-eating spirit of our ancestors who fought and bled over 3%, nearly all should agree that our current system is extremely unjust.  My effective tax rate on marginal earnings is 35%, which Obama seeks to raise to 39.6%.  In addition, though my marginal dollars are not subject to the self-employment tax, they are subject to the Medicare tax of 2.9%, for benefits that are mathematically impossible for the government to ever deliver to me as someone (for a precious few weeks) still in my 20’s.

So every dollar I earn is subject to a marginal rate of 42.5%.

Now if I am really doing what I am supposed to do as a Christian father and head of household, I do not really work for myself, but for my family, as a mere trustee of wealth for future generations.  In preparing a will recently, it dawned on me that my family business is an asset the government will value for estate tax purposes, and that it will likely be subject to the estate tax, due to the valuations presently at play in my industry.  This means every dollar I earn is first subject to a 42.5% income tax and, after I pay those taxes, on top of that is also effectively subject to a 45% estate tax, if I intend to use the dollar, as I should, for the benefit of my progeny and not my own selfish pleasure.  Oh, and if I try to leave the money to my grandchildren instead, they double-estate-tax that (not technically the estate tax, but a little thing the IRS calls the “generation skipping transfer tax”), ensuring they eat 45% of my family’s savings every 30 or so years when a generation dies off.

So the effective rate my family pays on an earned dollar is equal to 1 – (1-0.425)(1-0.45) or 68.375%.  Every dollar I earn is subject to a government levy of 69 cents.  And we call ourselves a free country?  And this is not even counting state taxes, sales tax, property tax, or even the net cost of unnecessary government regulation, or the fact that each subsequent generation who inherits will also lose 45% of the principal.  And even then, as I prepare my tax return, I am informed that I owe AMT, the Alternative Minimum Tax, you see, because I’m getting too much of a deduction for property tax and they take away the first 3% or so of my charitable deductions.  Then TaxCut tells me that they’re taking away my child tax credits, which makes me question why I ever got social security numbers for my kids (hey, if they’re not giving me a tax credit, why not just have my kids “off the grid” where they never get sucked into this system? Under Obama’s plan, they could not pay taxes for 20 years and then apply for amnesty as an illegal alien, paying a $500 fine with no back taxes.).  The red number at the top of the screen gets bigger and bigger and I suddenly start to entertain Arlington Road-style revenge fantasies.

But it gets even worse.  Unless I am a successful speculator and know when to exit the dollar (and I pray for the divine revelation to do so!), I will eventually also pay an inflation tax equal to the current federal deficit as a percentage of GDP.  Right now that’s approaching 90%, so my wealth will be diluted again by almost 50% by inflation unless I time correctly my exit from the sinking ship of the US dollar.  Exit too soon and I’m in illiquid investments like gold with substandard returns and also subject to theft; exit too late and I’m left with Dead Presidents Wallpaper.

So those of you who tell us it is our moral duty to pay taxes, I show you the reality of the Beast that is the federal government.  Unless we admit that all men are forever slaves to their governments, without any rights whatsoever, there is no moral imperative to pay taxes to this government.  For now they nearly take all there is to get.

Wisdom, however, dictates that I do pay my taxes.  Just as it would be wise to pay protection money to Tony Soprano if he ran your neighborhood and owned the police, it is sometimes necessary to pay tribute to thieves and robbers for a season to protect one’s family.   But it is not one’s moral imperative to do so, and if good men can band together to reestablish justice and run the Mafia out of town, then they should.  And if individuals of more tender conscience, who cannot abide compromising with evil, refuse to pay the tribute, they must suffer the consequences but their resistance is not sinful.

This federal government that protects the murderers of unborn children is every bit and more the moral equivalent of a criminal gang.  May God give us the courage to stand up to them one day.  Until that time, I advise you to pay your taxes and keep your nose clean.

Maybe now it is easier to understand why my best strategy this time of year is to write the check to the US Treasury, take a vacation and try not to be angry.  But please don’t tell me it’s my Christian duty to pay off these criminals.

Rick Warren: Liar

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Defau … ?id=481280

More from Rick’s Politically-Driven Life…

Rick Warren 2009:

Monday night on CNN’s Larry King Live, Pastor Rick Warren apologized for his support of Prop. 8, California’s voter-approved marriage protection amendment, saying he has “never been and never will be” an “anti-gay or anti-gay marriage activist.”

“During the whole Proposition 8 thing, I never once went to a meeting, never once issued a statement, never — never once even gave an endorsement in the two years Prop. 8 was going,” Warren told the CNN audience on Monday. ”The week before the — the vote, somebody in my church said, ‘Pastor Rick, what — what do you think about this?’ And I sent a note to my own members that said, I actually believe that marriage is — really should be defined, that that definition should be — say between a man and a woman.”

During his CNN interview on Monday, Warren expressed regret for backing Prop. 8. ”There were a number of things that were put out. I wrote to all my gay friends — the leaders that I knew — and actually apologized to them. That never got out,” he admitted.

Additionally, Pastor Warren said he did not want to comment on or criticize the Iowa Supreme Court’s decision last week to legalize same-sex “marriage” because it was “not his agenda.”

Rick Warren 2008:

However, just two weeks before the November 4 Prop. 8 vote, Pastor Warren issued a clear endorsement of the marriage amendment while speaking to church members. ”We support Proposition 8 — and if you believe what the Bible says about marriage, you need to support Proposition 8,” he said.

The following is a complete transcript of Warren’s comments just weeks before the Prop. 8 election:

“The election’s coming just in a couple of weeks, and I hope you’re praying about your vote. One of the propositions, of course, that I want to mention is Proposition 8, which is the proposition that had to be instituted because the courts threw out the will of the people. And a court of four guys actually voted to change a definition of marriage that has been going for 5,000 years.

“Now let me say this really clearly: we support Proposition 8 — and if you believe what the Bible says about marriage, you need to support Proposition 8. I never support a candidate, but on moral issues I come out very clear.

“This is one thing, friends, that all politicians tend to agree on. Both Barack Obama and John McCain, I flat-out asked both of them: what is your definition of marriage? And they both said the same thing — it is the traditional, historic, universal definition of marriage: one man and one woman, for life. And every culture for 5,000 years, and every religion for 5,000 years, has said the definition of marriage is between one man and a woman.

“Now here’s an interesting thing. There are about two percent of Americans [who] are homosexual or gay/lesbian people. We should not let two percent of the population determine to change a definition of marriage that has been supported by every single culture and every single religion for 5,000 years.

“This is not even just a Christian issue — it’s a humanitarian and human issue that God created marriage for the purpose of family, love, and procreation.

“So I urge you to support Proposition 8, and pass that word on. I’m going to be sending out a note to pastors on what I believe about this. But everybody knows what I believe about it. They heard me at the Civil Forum when I asked both Obama and McCain on their views.”

Tomorrow Belongs To…

Saturday, March 7th, 2009

This liberal Kaufman at Harvard sees the writing on the wall…

http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/pub … Fpage%3D82

The increase in the size of a religion’s fundamentalist population can change the local and even national politics of a country. During the twentieth century, conservative Protestants increased from little more than a third of the white Protestant total (among those born in 1900) to almost two-thirds (for those born after 1975). Only a quarter of this effect was down to changes in switching patterns, the rest accruing to demography. Indeed, one graph showed the relationship between a state’s non-Hispanic White total fertility rate (TFR) in 2002 and the percent vote for George Bush in 2004. At one end of the spectrum was Utah, which had the highest TFR and percentage of people who voted for Bush, and on the other end was Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

Kaufmann hypothesizes that while the Fukuyama, “post-historical” core societies — liberal democratic, capitalist and secular — have been able to survive external threats like the advancement of technology and the challenge of socialism, it may not be a demographically sustainable system. There is the possibility that the stark differences in growth rate between religious fundamentalists and others could threaten this system from within.

In reply to a question, Kaufmann speculated that demography may expose a contradiction, first cited by Nietzsche, between liberalism’s practical need to defend itself and its inability to legitimate the illiberal policies that may be required to do so.

Or as Robert Frost put it, a liberal is someone unwilling to take his own side in an argument.  Raising conservative babies is one of the most aggressive acts you can take against the system.  Call it the Palin Revolution.  Guns, Babies, Jesus!

Throwing the Baby Out With the Macroevolutionary Bathwater

Tuesday, February 17th, 2009

Great post over at TakiMag concerning the self-defeating efforts of conservatives to dismiss Darwin’s insights:

I too am often disappointed that pundits on the pseudo-Right seek to undermine an insight that could strengthen their alleged worldview.  It’s no surprise that lurking below Intelligent Design there is an appeal to a form of universalism (and all its attendant condemnations), not unlike pro-life activists invoking civil-rights rhetoric and modern Christians championing universal human rights.

http://www.takimag.com/sniperstower/art … tionalism/

The fact that some extreme atheists use Darwinism as a sort of religion to explain ultimate origins does not excuse Christians who invoke the equally atheistic spirit of the French Revolution to attack it.  Both are lies.  And as I’ve pointed out before, all of the practical, political implications of Darwinism are microevolutionary in nature:

2008/12/13/intelligent-design-vs-evolution-a-conclusion/

When poor people with two-digit IQ’s are given the right to immigrate and vote on politicians who then decide how to tax the greater property and income of those with three-digit IQ’s, whom they outnumber, democracy becomes a farce of two wolves voting themselves a lamb for dinner.  When those differences are largely genetic and intractable, and those with less wealth have higher birthrates, we have a recipe for a very unstable society, on its way to the logical progression of multiculturalism: from the First World to crony-corrupt Mexico, from Mexico to racial-socialist Venezuela, from Venezuela to the affirmative-action-state (and world rape capital) of South Africa, from South Africa to the lawless murders, rapes, stealing and mass inflation of Zimbabwe, and from Zimbabwe to the permanent abyss of Haiti.

But hey, it feels good to rant about Hitler and Darwin, right?

The Empire Strikes Back

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

What kind of bizarro-world is it when the Catholic Church, looking quite well down the liberal road only a few decades ago, shows more principle than the world’s best known Southern Baptist?

Vatican officials said Saturday they were disappointed by President Barack Obama’s decision to end a ban on federal funding for international groups that perform abortions or provide information on them.

Monsignor Rino Fisichella, who heads the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy for Life, urged Obama to listen to all voices in America without “the arrogance of those who, being in power, believe they can decide of life and death.”

Fisichella said in an interview published Saturday in Corriere della Sera that “if this is one of President Obama’s first acts, I have to say, in all due respect, that we’re heading quickly toward disappointment.”

Obama signed an executive order that ended the ban on Friday, reversing the policy of the Bush administration.

I mean Catholics, Catholics! When I was growing up, the Catholics thought the Baptists were weird for being all caught up in personal sanctification and especially for making their faith a motivation for political activism.  Now we have Southern Baptist preacher giving the invocation for a child murderer President while the Pope stands up for the innocent!

And it gets better.  Just today, the Pope un-excommunicated conservatives who left the fold following their dissatisfaction with the liberalizing tendencies of Vatican II.  And it’s made a certain non-Christian group unhappy:

The four bishops belong to a movement founded by late French traditionalist Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. Followers oppose dialogue with other religions and say Jews should convert. Rome’s chief rabbi said Williamson’s rehabilitation in particular would open “a deep wound” in Jewish-Vatican relations, which had already been strained by recent controversy over the effort to make Pope Pius XII a saint despite some historians’ contention that he did little to save Jews during the Holocaust. The French Jewish organization CRIF called Williamson “a despicable liar whose only goal is to revive the centuries-old hatred against Jews.”

What Flavor Kool-Aid Did They Drink?

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

“Drinking the Kool-Aid” is an idiom referring to Jim Jones’ cult committing mass suicide in South America.  Jones’ modus operandi seems to have been flushed down the memory hole, for obvious reasons.  A condensed biography from left-leaning Wikipedia:

James Warren “Jim” Jones (May 13, 1931 – November 18, 1978) was the founder of the Peoples Temple, which is best known for the November 18, 1978 death of over 900 Temple members in Jonestown, Guyana along with the deaths of nine other people at a nearby airstrip and in Georgetown.

In 1951, Jones became a member of the Communist Party USA, and began attending meetings and rallies in Indianapolis.[11] Jones became flustered with harassment he received during the McCarthy Hearings,[11] particularly regarding meetings between Jones and his mother with Paul Robeson.[12] He also became frustrated with what he perceived to be ostracism of open communists in the United States, especially during the trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.[13] This frustration, among other things, provoked a seminal moment for Jones in which he asked himself “how can I demonstrate my Marxism? The thought was, infiltrate the church.”[12][11]

Jones’ interest in religion began during his childhood, primarily because he found making friends difficult, though initially he vacillated on his church of choice.[3] Jones was surprised when a Methodist superintendent helped Jones to get a start in the church even though he knew Jones to be a communist and Jones did not meet him through the American Communist Party.[13] In 1952, Jones became a student pastor in Sommerset Southside Methodist Church, but left that church because its leaders barred him from integrating blacks into his congregation.[11] Around this time, Jones witnessed a faith-healing service at the Seventh Day Baptist Church.[11] He observed that it attracted people and their money and concluded that, with financial resources from such healings, he could help accomplish his social goals.[11]

In 1960, Indianapolis Democratic Mayor Charles Boswell appointed Jones as a director of the Human Rights Commission.[15] Jones ignored Boswell’s advice to keep a low profile, finding new outlets for his views on local radio and television programs.[15] When the mayor and other commissioners asked Jones to curtail his public actions, Jones resisted and was wildly cheered at a meeting of the NAACP and Urban League when he yelled for his audience to be more militant, and climaxed with “Let my people go!”[16]

During this time, Jones also helped to integrate churches, restaurants, the telephone company, the police department, a theater, an amusement park, and the Methodist Hospital.[11] After swastikas were painted on the homes of two African American families, Jones personally walked the neighborhood comforting African Americans and counseling white families not to move, in order to prevent white flight.[17] Jones set up stings to catch restaurants refusing to serve African American customers.[17] Jones wrote American Nazi leaders and then leaked their responses to the media.[18] When Jones was accidentally placed in the black ward of a hospital after a collapse in 1961, Jones refused to be moved and began to make the beds, and empty the bed pans, of black patients.[19] Political pressures resulting from Jones’ actions caused hospital officials to desegregate the wards.[19]

Jones received considerable criticism in Indiana for his integrationist views.[11] White owned businesses and locals were critical of him.[17] A swastika was placed on the Temple, a stick of dynamite was left in a Temple coal pile and a dead cat was thrown at Jones’ house after a threatening phone call.[18] Other incidents occurred, though some suspect that Jones himself may have been involved in at least some of them.[18]

Jim and Marceline Jones adopted several children of at least partial non-Caucasian ancestry; he referred to the clan as his “rainbow family,”[20] and stated: “Integration is a more personal thing with me now. It’s a question of my son’s future.”[21] That comported with Jones’ portrayal of the Temple overall as a “rainbow family.”

The couple adopted three children of Korean-American ancestry: Lew, Suzanne and Stephanie. Jones had been encouraging Temple members to adopt orphans from war ravaged Korea.[22] Jones had long been critical of the United States’ opposition to communist leader Kim Il-Sung’s 1950 invasion of South Korea, calling it the “war of liberation” and stating that “the south is a living example of all that socialism in the north has overcome.”[23] In 1954, he and his wife also adopted Agnes Jones, who was partly of Native American descent.[21][24] Agnes was 11 at the time of her adoption.[25] Suzanne Jones was adopted at the age of six in 1959.[25] In June 1959, the couple had their only biological child, Stephan Gandhi Jones.[24]

Two years later, in 1961, the Joneses became the first white couple in Indiana to adopt an African American child, James Warren Jones, Jr.[26] Marceline was once spat upon while she carried Jim Jr. [18]

The couple also adopted another son, who was white, named Tim.[24] Tim Jones, whose birth mother was a member of the Peoples Temple, was originally named Timothy Glen Tupper.[21]

After Jones’ return to Indiana from Brazil, in 1965, Jones claimed that the world would be engulfed in a nuclear war on July 15, 1967, that would then create a new socialist Eden on earth, and that the Temple must move to Northern California for safety.[35][11] Accordingly, the Temple began moving to Redwood Valley, California.[11]

While Jones always spoke of the social gospel’s virtues, before the late 1960s Jones chose to conceal that his gospel was actually communism.[11] By the late 1960s, Jones began at least partially openly revealing in Temple sermons his “Apostolic Socialism” concept.[11] Specifically, “those who remained drugged with the opiate of religion had to be brought to enlightenment — socialism.”[36] Jones often mixed those concepts, such as preaching that “If you’re born in capitalist America, racist America, fascist America, then you’re born in sin. But if you’re born in socialism, you’re not born in sin.”[37]

By the early 1970s, Jones began deriding traditional Christianity as “fly away religion,” rejecting the Bible as being white men’s’ justification to subordinate women and subjugate people of color and stating that it spoke of a “Sky God” who was no God at all.[11] Jones authored a booklet titled “The Letter Killeth,” criticizing the Bible.[38]

By the Spring of 1976, Jones began openly admitting even to outsiders that he was an atheist.[39] Despite the Temple’s fear that the IRS was investigating its religious tax exemption, by 1977 Marceline Jones admitted to the New York Times that, as early as age 18 when he watched his then idol Mao Zedong overthrow the Chinese government, Jim Jones realized that the way to achieve social change through Marxism in the United States was to mobilize people through religion.[35] She stated that “Jim used religion to try to get some people out of the opiate of religion,” and had slammed the Bible on the table yelling “I’ve got to destroy this paper idol!” [35]

The Marxist is an environmental determinist, someone who believes inequality is explained by economic exploitation, not natural differences in ability.  When American civic life accepted the lie of equality, it gave the Marxists a toehold to critique our way of life.  Deliberately suppressing truth, even (or especially) truth we would rather ignore, has the effect of searing the conscience, making us tolerate great evil that perpetuates the lie we want to believe.

This is why people like Rick Warren are getting behind Obama: they ought to know better, but they want to believe in this post-racial fantasy so badly that they ignore all evidence to the contrary.

Men once had a similar idea:

Genesis 11

1And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.

2And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.

3And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter.

4And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

Part of this can be chalked up to an insufficient appreciation of the depravity of man.  I have enough trouble loving my own wife as I should; she is the mother of my children, and our interests are perfectly aligned, but it will take a lifetime of sanctification to improve this relationship, which is consistent with nature.

How much harder, then, will it be to make men of different cultures and backgrounds, who often have legitimate conflicts of interest (e.g. affirmative action, which imposes costs on whites and Asians to benefit favored minority groups), get along well enough to sustain a functional civilization?

A fun activity when I was a boy was to take a shovel to a large antpile and carry a huge chunk of it to another antpile.  The ants would provide entertainment as they attempted to repel their invaders.

Jim Jones liked to stir up antpiles, those natural divisions of human life that, like firebreaks in a forest, served to prevent evil from infecting the whole lump of humanity.  He probably even saw this explicitly, as Communists in the early 20th century came to the conclusion that national pride and identity was the major impediment to bringing the proletariat and intellectuals into worldwide alliance.  And so the program was adopted and applied to the present.

The present economic crisis is going to tear this lie wide open.  The world’s oldest democracy, Iceland, a land where everyone is more-or-less third cousins, witnessed riots last week as their Parliament attempted to meet.  The government here will eventually run out of financial duct tape.  If Iceland riots, what will happen here?

When Jones’ utopia experiment didn’t work, his followers were willing to kill themselves rather than admit they were living a lie.  Such is the power of this lie, of the brotherhood of man, like the original lie, that we should be as gods.  For what else do you call it when we war against the ordained order of things?  I pray that our own government, when its foundations of sand are exposed, goes out with a whimper instead of a suicidal act against the American people.

The Obama infatuation is of the same spirit of Jim Jones; a leader whose flaws are suppressed and who is trusted implicitly to erase the practical difficulties of constructing our modern-day Babel.

What is the alternative?  Peaceful co-existence, akin to the old Swiss model.  A nation of one people, peaceful in commerce and trade, neutral in war, and an acceptance that we cannot remake the rest of the world in our image.

Kipling said it best:

The Stranger within my gate,
He may be true or kind,
But he does not talk my talk—
I cannot feel his mind.
I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
But not the soul behind.

The men of my own stock,
They may do ill or well,
But they tell the lies I am wonted to,
They are used to the lies I tell;
And we do not need interpreters
When we go to buy or sell.

The Stranger within my gates,
He may be evil or good,
But I cannot tell what powers control—
What reasons sway his mood;
Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
Shall repossess his blood.

The men of my own stock,
Bitter bad they may be,
But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
And see the things I see;
And whatever I think of them and their likes
They think of the likes of me.

This was my father’s belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf—
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children’s teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.

Pastor Rick Happy About Homo “Bishop”

Friday, January 16th, 2009

Click here for the story.

The Rev. Rick Warren, the conservative evangelical minister who will deliver the invocation at Barack Obama’s inauguration, has extended an olive branch to Bishop V. Gene Robinson.

Robinson, an openly gay Episcopal bishop, had reacted angrily to the selection of Warren, who opposes gay marriage, calling it a “slap in the face.” But then Robinson was selected this week to give the invocation at the inaugural opening ceremony at the Sunday afternoon concert on the Mall.

Today, Warren issued a statement praising Obama for selecting Robinson, saying the president-elect “has again demonstrated his genuine commitment to bringing all Americans of goodwill together in search of common ground. I applaud his desire to be the president of every citizen.”

You can feel the ratchet tightening; first silence, then tolerance, then endorsement.  Absent a change, twenty years from now evangelicals will be issuing calls for “Gay-Straight Reconciliation” to apologize for the sins of their bigoted forebears.  You know, those jerks who read the Bible and take it more seriously than just getting along with the world.