Archive for January, 2009

The Empire Strikes Back

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

What kind of bizarro-world is it when the Catholic Church, looking quite well down the liberal road only a few decades ago, shows more principle than the world’s best known Southern Baptist?

Vatican officials said Saturday they were disappointed by President Barack Obama’s decision to end a ban on federal funding for international groups that perform abortions or provide information on them.

Monsignor Rino Fisichella, who heads the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy for Life, urged Obama to listen to all voices in America without “the arrogance of those who, being in power, believe they can decide of life and death.”

Fisichella said in an interview published Saturday in Corriere della Sera that “if this is one of President Obama’s first acts, I have to say, in all due respect, that we’re heading quickly toward disappointment.”

Obama signed an executive order that ended the ban on Friday, reversing the policy of the Bush administration.

I mean Catholics, Catholics! When I was growing up, the Catholics thought the Baptists were weird for being all caught up in personal sanctification and especially for making their faith a motivation for political activism.  Now we have Southern Baptist preacher giving the invocation for a child murderer President while the Pope stands up for the innocent!

And it gets better.  Just today, the Pope un-excommunicated conservatives who left the fold following their dissatisfaction with the liberalizing tendencies of Vatican II.  And it’s made a certain non-Christian group unhappy:

The four bishops belong to a movement founded by late French traditionalist Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. Followers oppose dialogue with other religions and say Jews should convert. Rome’s chief rabbi said Williamson’s rehabilitation in particular would open “a deep wound” in Jewish-Vatican relations, which had already been strained by recent controversy over the effort to make Pope Pius XII a saint despite some historians’ contention that he did little to save Jews during the Holocaust. The French Jewish organization CRIF called Williamson “a despicable liar whose only goal is to revive the centuries-old hatred against Jews.”

What Flavor Kool-Aid Did They Drink?

Sunday, January 25th, 2009

“Drinking the Kool-Aid” is an idiom referring to Jim Jones’ cult committing mass suicide in South America.  Jones’ modus operandi seems to have been flushed down the memory hole, for obvious reasons.  A condensed biography from left-leaning Wikipedia:

James Warren “Jim” Jones (May 13, 1931 – November 18, 1978) was the founder of the Peoples Temple, which is best known for the November 18, 1978 death of over 900 Temple members in Jonestown, Guyana along with the deaths of nine other people at a nearby airstrip and in Georgetown.

In 1951, Jones became a member of the Communist Party USA, and began attending meetings and rallies in Indianapolis.[11] Jones became flustered with harassment he received during the McCarthy Hearings,[11] particularly regarding meetings between Jones and his mother with Paul Robeson.[12] He also became frustrated with what he perceived to be ostracism of open communists in the United States, especially during the trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.[13] This frustration, among other things, provoked a seminal moment for Jones in which he asked himself “how can I demonstrate my Marxism? The thought was, infiltrate the church.”[12][11]

Jones’ interest in religion began during his childhood, primarily because he found making friends difficult, though initially he vacillated on his church of choice.[3] Jones was surprised when a Methodist superintendent helped Jones to get a start in the church even though he knew Jones to be a communist and Jones did not meet him through the American Communist Party.[13] In 1952, Jones became a student pastor in Sommerset Southside Methodist Church, but left that church because its leaders barred him from integrating blacks into his congregation.[11] Around this time, Jones witnessed a faith-healing service at the Seventh Day Baptist Church.[11] He observed that it attracted people and their money and concluded that, with financial resources from such healings, he could help accomplish his social goals.[11]

In 1960, Indianapolis Democratic Mayor Charles Boswell appointed Jones as a director of the Human Rights Commission.[15] Jones ignored Boswell’s advice to keep a low profile, finding new outlets for his views on local radio and television programs.[15] When the mayor and other commissioners asked Jones to curtail his public actions, Jones resisted and was wildly cheered at a meeting of the NAACP and Urban League when he yelled for his audience to be more militant, and climaxed with “Let my people go!”[16]

During this time, Jones also helped to integrate churches, restaurants, the telephone company, the police department, a theater, an amusement park, and the Methodist Hospital.[11] After swastikas were painted on the homes of two African American families, Jones personally walked the neighborhood comforting African Americans and counseling white families not to move, in order to prevent white flight.[17] Jones set up stings to catch restaurants refusing to serve African American customers.[17] Jones wrote American Nazi leaders and then leaked their responses to the media.[18] When Jones was accidentally placed in the black ward of a hospital after a collapse in 1961, Jones refused to be moved and began to make the beds, and empty the bed pans, of black patients.[19] Political pressures resulting from Jones’ actions caused hospital officials to desegregate the wards.[19]

Jones received considerable criticism in Indiana for his integrationist views.[11] White owned businesses and locals were critical of him.[17] A swastika was placed on the Temple, a stick of dynamite was left in a Temple coal pile and a dead cat was thrown at Jones’ house after a threatening phone call.[18] Other incidents occurred, though some suspect that Jones himself may have been involved in at least some of them.[18]

Jim and Marceline Jones adopted several children of at least partial non-Caucasian ancestry; he referred to the clan as his “rainbow family,”[20] and stated: “Integration is a more personal thing with me now. It’s a question of my son’s future.”[21] That comported with Jones’ portrayal of the Temple overall as a “rainbow family.”

The couple adopted three children of Korean-American ancestry: Lew, Suzanne and Stephanie. Jones had been encouraging Temple members to adopt orphans from war ravaged Korea.[22] Jones had long been critical of the United States’ opposition to communist leader Kim Il-Sung’s 1950 invasion of South Korea, calling it the “war of liberation” and stating that “the south is a living example of all that socialism in the north has overcome.”[23] In 1954, he and his wife also adopted Agnes Jones, who was partly of Native American descent.[21][24] Agnes was 11 at the time of her adoption.[25] Suzanne Jones was adopted at the age of six in 1959.[25] In June 1959, the couple had their only biological child, Stephan Gandhi Jones.[24]

Two years later, in 1961, the Joneses became the first white couple in Indiana to adopt an African American child, James Warren Jones, Jr.[26] Marceline was once spat upon while she carried Jim Jr. [18]

The couple also adopted another son, who was white, named Tim.[24] Tim Jones, whose birth mother was a member of the Peoples Temple, was originally named Timothy Glen Tupper.[21]

After Jones’ return to Indiana from Brazil, in 1965, Jones claimed that the world would be engulfed in a nuclear war on July 15, 1967, that would then create a new socialist Eden on earth, and that the Temple must move to Northern California for safety.[35][11] Accordingly, the Temple began moving to Redwood Valley, California.[11]

While Jones always spoke of the social gospel’s virtues, before the late 1960s Jones chose to conceal that his gospel was actually communism.[11] By the late 1960s, Jones began at least partially openly revealing in Temple sermons his “Apostolic Socialism” concept.[11] Specifically, “those who remained drugged with the opiate of religion had to be brought to enlightenment — socialism.”[36] Jones often mixed those concepts, such as preaching that “If you’re born in capitalist America, racist America, fascist America, then you’re born in sin. But if you’re born in socialism, you’re not born in sin.”[37]

By the early 1970s, Jones began deriding traditional Christianity as “fly away religion,” rejecting the Bible as being white men’s’ justification to subordinate women and subjugate people of color and stating that it spoke of a “Sky God” who was no God at all.[11] Jones authored a booklet titled “The Letter Killeth,” criticizing the Bible.[38]

By the Spring of 1976, Jones began openly admitting even to outsiders that he was an atheist.[39] Despite the Temple’s fear that the IRS was investigating its religious tax exemption, by 1977 Marceline Jones admitted to the New York Times that, as early as age 18 when he watched his then idol Mao Zedong overthrow the Chinese government, Jim Jones realized that the way to achieve social change through Marxism in the United States was to mobilize people through religion.[35] She stated that “Jim used religion to try to get some people out of the opiate of religion,” and had slammed the Bible on the table yelling “I’ve got to destroy this paper idol!” [35]

The Marxist is an environmental determinist, someone who believes inequality is explained by economic exploitation, not natural differences in ability.  When American civic life accepted the lie of equality, it gave the Marxists a toehold to critique our way of life.  Deliberately suppressing truth, even (or especially) truth we would rather ignore, has the effect of searing the conscience, making us tolerate great evil that perpetuates the lie we want to believe.

This is why people like Rick Warren are getting behind Obama: they ought to know better, but they want to believe in this post-racial fantasy so badly that they ignore all evidence to the contrary.

Men once had a similar idea:

Genesis 11

1And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech.

2And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar; and they dwelt there.

3And they said one to another, Go to, let us make brick, and burn them thoroughly. And they had brick for stone, and slime had they for morter.

4And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.

Part of this can be chalked up to an insufficient appreciation of the depravity of man.  I have enough trouble loving my own wife as I should; she is the mother of my children, and our interests are perfectly aligned, but it will take a lifetime of sanctification to improve this relationship, which is consistent with nature.

How much harder, then, will it be to make men of different cultures and backgrounds, who often have legitimate conflicts of interest (e.g. affirmative action, which imposes costs on whites and Asians to benefit favored minority groups), get along well enough to sustain a functional civilization?

A fun activity when I was a boy was to take a shovel to a large antpile and carry a huge chunk of it to another antpile.  The ants would provide entertainment as they attempted to repel their invaders.

Jim Jones liked to stir up antpiles, those natural divisions of human life that, like firebreaks in a forest, served to prevent evil from infecting the whole lump of humanity.  He probably even saw this explicitly, as Communists in the early 20th century came to the conclusion that national pride and identity was the major impediment to bringing the proletariat and intellectuals into worldwide alliance.  And so the program was adopted and applied to the present.

The present economic crisis is going to tear this lie wide open.  The world’s oldest democracy, Iceland, a land where everyone is more-or-less third cousins, witnessed riots last week as their Parliament attempted to meet.  The government here will eventually run out of financial duct tape.  If Iceland riots, what will happen here?

When Jones’ utopia experiment didn’t work, his followers were willing to kill themselves rather than admit they were living a lie.  Such is the power of this lie, of the brotherhood of man, like the original lie, that we should be as gods.  For what else do you call it when we war against the ordained order of things?  I pray that our own government, when its foundations of sand are exposed, goes out with a whimper instead of a suicidal act against the American people.

The Obama infatuation is of the same spirit of Jim Jones; a leader whose flaws are suppressed and who is trusted implicitly to erase the practical difficulties of constructing our modern-day Babel.

What is the alternative?  Peaceful co-existence, akin to the old Swiss model.  A nation of one people, peaceful in commerce and trade, neutral in war, and an acceptance that we cannot remake the rest of the world in our image.

Kipling said it best:

The Stranger within my gate,
He may be true or kind,
But he does not talk my talk—
I cannot feel his mind.
I see the face and the eyes and the mouth,
But not the soul behind.

The men of my own stock,
They may do ill or well,
But they tell the lies I am wonted to,
They are used to the lies I tell;
And we do not need interpreters
When we go to buy or sell.

The Stranger within my gates,
He may be evil or good,
But I cannot tell what powers control—
What reasons sway his mood;
Nor when the Gods of his far-off land
Shall repossess his blood.

The men of my own stock,
Bitter bad they may be,
But, at least, they hear the things I hear,
And see the things I see;
And whatever I think of them and their likes
They think of the likes of me.

This was my father’s belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf—
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children’s teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.

The Risks of Affluence

Wednesday, January 21st, 2009

A decent article summarizing some important statistics if you ignore the psychobabble:

http://www.northshoremag.com/cgi-bin/ns … leged.html

Key takeaways:

1. Avoid affluent private schools after sixth grade.  I personally think a hybrid plan of private elementary school, homeschooled junior high and public high school (in a safe school district) is the next-best alternative to 100% homeschooling.

2. Don’t allow your kids to use a huge house as a means of escaping from the family, or vice versa for the family.  A smaller home is a healthier home in general.  I would also advocate eliminating single-occupant bedrooms if possible no matter how large the house (i.e. have fewer private areas and more common areas for activities; have a gameroom instead of a teenager’s own bedroom).  No Internet, no TV outside of public areas, under strict parental controls.

3. Don’t get over-involved in your kids’ activities and limit the number of adult-supervised formal things they do so they have more time for work around the house (or other genuine contributions to the family) and free play.

4. Don’t go buy your kids a bunch of “gear” for an activity they show interest in.  Make them buy their own gear or just buy a standard, not premium, level of quality.

5. If you have service providers like house cleaners, yard cutters, etc, reduce these in favor of child labor as soon as practically possible.

Key quotes:

Research shows that up to about seventh grade, affluence is a predictor of greater well-being. But after that point, Rampage says, the tide turns, and it becomes a predictor for increased problems. One-fifth of affluent 10th-grade girls experience significant depression. “That’s three times the national average,” Rampage says. “Affluent boys are 35 percent more likely than boys from poor or modest backgrounds to abuse alcohol, and popular boys from prosperous homes are at the greatest risk of all for substance abuse.”

In fact, the wealthier the child, the more likely to feel estranged. This matters because the best predictor for healthy adjustment is closeness to one’s parents, and the reverse is a warning sign for drug and alcohol use, anxiety and depression. And when these problems emerge in high school they may predict a lifelong vulnerability in adulthood.

One way that affluence plays a part, Rampage says, is that “closeness” has a literal component. A less-prosperous family usually shares a smaller space. Parents can see or hear when a child is upset or sad. Children can tell when their parents are worried and have a better sense of their family’s problems. The child is more likely to contribute, and the child’s contributions are more likely to be valued, which creates a sense of worth and responsibility.

Charismatic Preaches Truth

Monday, January 19th, 2009

Rod Parsley nails it on debt and slavery:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3051024550497129264

Pastor Rick Happy About Homo “Bishop”

Friday, January 16th, 2009

Click here for the story.

The Rev. Rick Warren, the conservative evangelical minister who will deliver the invocation at Barack Obama’s inauguration, has extended an olive branch to Bishop V. Gene Robinson.

Robinson, an openly gay Episcopal bishop, had reacted angrily to the selection of Warren, who opposes gay marriage, calling it a “slap in the face.” But then Robinson was selected this week to give the invocation at the inaugural opening ceremony at the Sunday afternoon concert on the Mall.

Today, Warren issued a statement praising Obama for selecting Robinson, saying the president-elect “has again demonstrated his genuine commitment to bringing all Americans of goodwill together in search of common ground. I applaud his desire to be the president of every citizen.”

You can feel the ratchet tightening; first silence, then tolerance, then endorsement.  Absent a change, twenty years from now evangelicals will be issuing calls for “Gay-Straight Reconciliation” to apologize for the sins of their bigoted forebears.  You know, those jerks who read the Bible and take it more seriously than just getting along with the world.

Lying Pharisee Fraud Artist Hurts Baby-Murderers

Monday, January 12th, 2009

Glory, glory halleleujah, His truth is marching on!  Our times are high cotton for schadenfreude connoisseurs.

Hit with declines in funding from the economic crisis and the Madoff scandal, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America is laying off around 20% of its staff.

Roughly 30 people were let go earlier this week, according to a source who works for the nonprofit. Executives at Planned Parenthood confirmed the layoffs, but declined to give more details.

Part of Planned Parenthood’s funding declines stem from the closing of the Florida-based Picower Foundation, which shut down in December because its assets were managed by Bernard Madoff. The $1 billion foundation was one of the few major funders of reproductive rights issues.

The “Hunger” Crisis

Saturday, January 10th, 2009

A great study I came across when researching charities online, by the Heritage Foundation:

Political advocates proclaim that the USDA reports suggest there is widespread chronic hunger in the U.S.[7] But the USDA clearly and specifically does not identify food insecurity with the more intense condition of “hunger,” which it defines as “discomfort, illness, weakness, or pain…caused by prolonged involuntary lack of food.”[8]

What is rarely discussed is that the government’s own data show that the overwhelming majority of food insecure adults are, like most adult Americans, overweight or obese. Among adult males experiencing food insecurity, fully 70 percent are overweight or obese.[9] Nearly three-quarters of adult women experiencing food insecurity are either overweight or obese, and nearly half (45 percent) are obese. Virtually no food insecure adults are underweight.

Food insecure men are slightly less likely to be overweight or obese than men who are food secure (70 percent compared to 75 percent). But food insecure women are actually more likely to be obese or overweight than are women who are food secure (73 percent compared to 64 percent).

Read the whole thing by clicking here.

I think we can start to build an addiction model for liberalism.  As Stuff White People Like has documented, the trendy urban liberal is an intellectually insecure person, usually with a soft degree (anthropology, art history, etc) from a wannabe-Ivy private college.  One way to increase one’s sense of self-importance, in a way that does not seem obviously boorish, is the cultivation of guilt.

By building up this narrative that our country is full of “hungry” people, the trendy liberal gets to inflate his or her own sense of self-importance.  WE’RE so privileged, so rich, and those people aren’t and need our help, and I’m morally superior all the other privileged rich oppressors because I feel guilty about it.  I mean, that’s a lot easier than the truth, which is you’re 35, still single, living in an urban hell-hole one-bedroom apartment going to Obama meetups, and the second-rate gold-plated degree isn’t cutting it for a career, because those Republicans who own all the businesses don’t place much market value on your master’s thesis about the Puerto Rican lesbian rights movement.

It reminds me of those high school kids who cut themselves.  The pain of cutting produces an endorphin rush that helps regulate serotonin levels, kind of a natural Prozac.  I imagine guilt has a similar neurological pathway for some people.  This probably why the “social justice” movement within left-evangelical circles is so attractive; religion and mental guilt-cutting are a potent mix. Get neurochemically high on religion like a Pentecostal without having to jump around and bark like a dog:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4627856748432211034

Ron Paul Looking Smart Right Now

Wednesday, January 7th, 2009
YouTube Preview Image

He looks good for 73, too.  I met him on a flight last fall into Houston and remarked that it’s a shame the whole crisis didn’t materialize until after the primaries.  Maybe he would have had a better chance, though I doubt it.  This government is bankrupt, finished, and no one wants to admit it.  Our people and our country will live on, but this government has no future.

The Tax-Eating Elite: A Case Study

Saturday, January 3rd, 2009

Steve Sailer has a post today about the new Democratic appointee to the U.S. Senate in Colorado, Michael Bennet, who is the head of the (horrible, high-cost) Denver school system.  The most interesting part of his post was his feature of Mr. Bennet’s 1997 wedding announcement from the blue-blood society section of the New York Times (my comments in italics):

Susan Diane Daggett, a daughter of Patricia B. Palmer of Little Rock, Ark., and Jesse B. Daggett of Marianna, Ark., was married yesterday to Michael Farrand Bennet, a son of Douglas J. Bennet Jr. of Middletown, Conn., and Susanne K. Bennet of Washington. The Rev. Arnold W. Hearn, an Episcopal priest, performed the ceremony at Crystal Lake in Marianna.

The bride, 33, a lawyer, is to join the Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund (non-profit parasite), formerly the Sierra Club Legal Defense Fund, in Denver next month. Ms. Daggett, who is keeping her name, graduated magna cum laude from Mount Holyoke College, and she and the bridegroom received law degrees from Yale University.

Her mother is a painter and an instructor at the Arkansas Art Center’s Museum School (tax-eating parasite) in Little Rock. Her father is a partner in Daggett, VanDover, Donovan & Perry, a Little Rock law firm (quasi-parasite).

Mr. Bennet, 32, was until recently a counsel to the Deputy Attorney General of the United States (tax-eating parasite). He graduated with honors from Wesleyan University.

His father is the president of Wesleyan (non-profit federally-subsidized parasite); he was the Assistant Secretary of State for international organizations (tax-eating parasite) in 1993 and 1994 and the president of National Public Radio (tax-eating parasite) from 1983 until 1992. The bridegroom’s mother is an art historian specializing in Roman antiquities (no employment listed).

What’s interesting in this pedigree, a random sample of the American liberal elite, is how every single individual is a parasite or tax-eater of some kind.  No one makes their living in the free market.  The closest is the bride’s father, a successful lawyer, but that doesn’t really count since lawyers essentially earn their money at the point of a gun (try not paying a judgment and the sheriff’s guns will show up to collect it eventually).

Not one individual competes in the free market, and their corrupt elite status is perpetuated by taxpayers at every level.  Is it any wonder so many white liberals support Obama?