<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whose President Is He Anyway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomsbigpicture.com/2007/03/16/whose-president-is-he-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomsbigpicture.com/2007/03/16/whose-president-is-he-anyway/</link>
	<description>A Discussion of Politics, Religion, Business, Science, Technology and Life - Comments Encouraged!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.tomsbigpicture.com/2007/03/16/whose-president-is-he-anyway/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomsbigpicture.com/2007/03/16/whose-president-is-he-anyway/#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>Or a more germane quote (de Tocqueville):

"&lt;i&gt;But the demagogues of Europe have made strange discoveries. According to them, a republic is not the rule of the majority, as has hitherto been thought, but the rule of those who are strenuous partisans of the majority. It is not the people who preponderate in this kind of government, but those who know what is good for the people, a happy distinction which allows men to act in the name of nations without consulting them and to claim their gratitude while their rights are trampled underfoot. A republican government, they hold, moreover, is the only one that has the right of doing whatever it chooses and despising what men have hitherto respected, from the highest moral laws to the vulgar rules of common sense. Until our time it had been supposed that despotism was odious, under whatever form it appeared. But it is a discovery of modern days that there are such things as legitimate tyranny and holy injustice, provided they are exercised in the name of the people.&lt;i&gt;"

Of course, in this case, it's a question of what people is it in whose name Bush is claiming to act?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or a more germane quote (de Tocqueville):</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>But the demagogues of Europe have made strange discoveries. According to them, a republic is not the rule of the majority, as has hitherto been thought, but the rule of those who are strenuous partisans of the majority. It is not the people who preponderate in this kind of government, but those who know what is good for the people, a happy distinction which allows men to act in the name of nations without consulting them and to claim their gratitude while their rights are trampled underfoot. A republican government, they hold, moreover, is the only one that has the right of doing whatever it chooses and despising what men have hitherto respected, from the highest moral laws to the vulgar rules of common sense. Until our time it had been supposed that despotism was odious, under whatever form it appeared. But it is a discovery of modern days that there are such things as legitimate tyranny and holy injustice, provided they are exercised in the name of the people.</i><i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, in this case, it&#8217;s a question of what people is it in whose name Bush is claiming to act?</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.tomsbigpicture.com/2007/03/16/whose-president-is-he-anyway/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomsbigpicture.com/2007/03/16/whose-president-is-he-anyway/#comment-993</guid>
		<description>To quote de Tocqueville:

"The inhabitants of the United States talk much of their attachment to their country; but I confess that I do not rely upon that calculating patriotism which is founded upon interest and which a change in the interests may destroy. Nor do I attach much importance to the language of the Americans when they manifest, in their daily conversation, the intention of maintaining the Federal system adopted by their forefathers. A government retains its sway over a great number of citizens far less by the voluntary and rational consent of the multitude than by that instinctive, and to a certain extent involuntary, agreement which results from similarity of feelings and resemblances of opinion. I will never admit that men constitute a social body simply because they obey the same head and the same laws. Society can exist only when a great number of men consider a great number of things under the same aspect, when they hold the same opinions upon many subjects, and when the same occurrences suggest the same thoughts and impressions to their minds."

Brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To quote de Tocqueville:</p>
<p>&#8220;The inhabitants of the United States talk much of their attachment to their country; but I confess that I do not rely upon that calculating patriotism which is founded upon interest and which a change in the interests may destroy. Nor do I attach much importance to the language of the Americans when they manifest, in their daily conversation, the intention of maintaining the Federal system adopted by their forefathers. A government retains its sway over a great number of citizens far less by the voluntary and rational consent of the multitude than by that instinctive, and to a certain extent involuntary, agreement which results from similarity of feelings and resemblances of opinion. I will never admit that men constitute a social body simply because they obey the same head and the same laws. Society can exist only when a great number of men consider a great number of things under the same aspect, when they hold the same opinions upon many subjects, and when the same occurrences suggest the same thoughts and impressions to their minds.&#8221;</p>
<p>Brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.tomsbigpicture.com/2007/03/16/whose-president-is-he-anyway/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomsbigpicture.com/2007/03/16/whose-president-is-he-anyway/#comment-936</guid>
		<description>C'mon, Tom... Bush is an internationalist, in the image of his father, who thinks that silly things like borders are anachronistic and obsolete; he's not so much the President of the United States of America as he is one of the many priveleged-to-serve leaders of the world. (Remember the NWO?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, Tom&#8230; Bush is an internationalist, in the image of his father, who thinks that silly things like borders are anachronistic and obsolete; he&#8217;s not so much the President of the United States of America as he is one of the many priveleged-to-serve leaders of the world. (Remember the NWO?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sobieski</title>
		<link>http://www.tomsbigpicture.com/2007/03/16/whose-president-is-he-anyway/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sobieski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomsbigpicture.com/2007/03/16/whose-president-is-he-anyway/#comment-864</guid>
		<description>El Presidente Jorge Bush promised his citizens to crush the American infidels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El Presidente Jorge Bush promised his citizens to crush the American infidels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
