You Mean We’re Not All the Same?
The problem with science and ideologies is that science every now and then drops a “data bomb” on man’s vain efforts to simplify God’s Creation. Both evolutionists and creationists have been guilty of this to some degree.
Evolutionists in the post-WWII era have maintained that, while evolution has great implications for the origin of life and for differences between and among a species, there are very little differences between the varieties of man, and all of these differences are at most superficial. These latter conclusions are politically convenient for globalist multicultural interests, and any scientist who deviates from the “party line” on this is punished professionally.
Some prominent Creationists, pathetically eager to score points with the liberal equalitarian zeitgeist of the contemporary world, proudly proclaim their belief in man’s literal equality (as opposed to the Biblically supported concept of mere legal equality before God). They hope to claim a politically correct moral high ground over early evolutionists’ beliefs concerning racial differences. In summary, these creationists promote their historically anomalous liberal interpretations of the Bible to produce various specious arguments that sum up to “Darwin=Hitler”. In reality, Darwin merely provided a theory of a naturalistic process to explain certain empirical observations. The observations themselves stand, but the new-age Creationists try to deny the very observations, rather than restricting themselves as they should to denying the atheistic tendencies of the theory of evolution. Any evil resulting from evolution is due to its denial of God. The observations it seeks to explain, the fact that man is a highly diverse creation, that we’re not all the same, are key to providing a rational argument against globalism.
By attacking dead scientists by association with what dead tyrants did with their theories, they do nothing but score cheap political points against their evolutionist opponents (who will simply deny the validity of the tyrants’ abuses), while surrendering the key ideological battles to the very real threat of equalitarian globalism. If we’re really all the same, then why not have one-world government?
Well, a new “data bomb” tends to show them both to be wrong. It turns out that there’s an entire additional “encryption layer” of information on top of the double helix of DNA, increasing the information density of God’s “organic hard drives” by an order of magnitude greater than we previously thought. This means that A) man is 400% less related to the chimpanzee genetically than we previously thought (94% versus 98.5%, whether you view this as evolution or just God reusing the same blueprints) and B) the varieties of man are 1000% less related to each other (99% versus 99.9%) than previously thought.
This is a huge discovery in genetics. That means there’s up to 1/6 the difference between men as there is between man and chimpanzee. And with this additional information density encoded into DNA, it certainly makes spontaneous evolution a much greater leap of logic.
It looks like God created us, and He created us with a wide variety of difference, not all necessarily superficial. And no amount of equalitarian ideological wishful thinking can change that, whether of the evolutionary atheist or new-age Creationist variety.