Archive for January, 2007

Kipling’s Norman and Saxon

Wednesday, January 31st, 2007

This poem by Kipling describes a dying Norman (i.e. the Germanic-blooded but French-speaking tribe that conquered England in 1066) instructing his son in how to lead and govern his Saxon charges, the older inhabitants of England with less refined manners, at least from a French perspective- in other words, the original rednecks. And good advice too, even for Saxons today seeking to lead their own people…

The other day while walking in our neighborhood with my wife and family (we live in a country subdivision with minimum 5-acre lots), I noticed some of my good-old-boy neighbors in full camouflage, coming out of the woods. Now, deer season is over, and they probably weren’t hunting.

But if they were, in their defense, they would merely be following the traditions of our ancestors for a thousand years, who even back in England shamelessly poached the “king’s deer” whenever possible. Even my wife, who is a much stricter rule-follower than myself, when I explained that they technically shouldn’t be hunting right now (assuming on the off chance that’s what they were doing), was offended at the notion that you can’t hunt “on your own land” unless it’s hunting season. Now, I’m not saying I oppose hunting regulation, as I support legitimate conservation efforts to preserve the game population for future generations, but I think her reaction illustrates our people’s tendency to appeal to the higher law of right and fairness instead of the technical letters of statutes- the latter being a purely French concoction alien to English freemen and their ancient common law.

While I am not a particularly eager outdoorsman myself (I make myself go fishing twice a year because I think it’s good for a man to go kill animals for food every now and then- and if I ever have a son, I’ll certainly want him to have the experience of shedding an animal’s blood, as it is an education on the realities of life), I am the exception among our people. I find it amusing that all across the South, the ultimate career goal of many a smart lawyer or doctor is to earn enough money to buy a piece of land in the middle of nowhere where they can go and sit in a tree, doused with raccoon or “doe in heat” urine, waiting to kill the big one.

The redneck has not been bred out of us yet, and good thing too.

Norman and Saxon
A.D. 1100

“My son,” said the Norman Baron, “I am dying, and you will
be heir
To all the broad acres in England that William gave me for
share
When he conquered the Saxon at Hastings, and a nice little
handful it is.
But before you go over to rule it I want you to understand this:–

“The Saxon is not like us Normans. His manners are not so polite.
But he never means anything serious till he talks about justice
right.
When he stands like an ox in the furrow–with his sullen set eyes
on your own,
And grumbles, ‘This isn’t fair dealing,’ my son, leave the Saxon
alone.

“You can horsewhip your Gascony archers, or torture your
Picardy spears;
But don’t try that game on the Saxon; you’ll have the whole
brood round your ears.
From the richest old Thane in the county to the poorest chained
serf in the field,
They’ll be at you and on you like hornets, and, if you are wise,
you will yield.

“But first you must master their language, their dialect, proverbs
and songs.
Don’t trust any clerk to interpret when they come with the tale
of their own wrongs.
Let them know that you know what they are saying; let them feel
that you know what to say.
Yes, even when you want to go hunting, hear ‘em out if it takes
you all day.

They’ll drink every hour of the daylight and poach every hour
of the dark.
It’s the sport not the rabbits they’re after (we’ve plenty of game
in the park).
Don’t hang them or cut off their fingers. That’s wasteful as well
as unkind,
For a hard-bitten, South-country poacher makes the best man-
at-arms you can find.

“Appear with your wife and the children at their weddings and
funerals and feasts.
Be polite but not friendly to Bishops; be good to all poor parish
priests.
Say ‘we,’ ‘us’ and ‘ours’ when you’re talking, instead of ‘you
fellows’ and ‘I.’
Don’t ride over seeds; keep your temper; and never you tell ‘em
a lie!”

The Federal Reserve Explained

Wednesday, January 31st, 2007

An educational, entertaining documentary for anyone interested in how our Federal Reserve money system actually works. Parts feature Rep. Ron Paul (now officially in the race for President in 2008), the Texas Congressman who always votes “no” on nearly every bill (as he considers nearly everything Congress does to be unconstitutional based on a strict interpretation of the Founders’ intent).

A Couple of Minor Format Changes, and What to Expect

Wednesday, January 31st, 2007

I get motivated by things that are easily scalable.  And nothing is more scalable than a web page, esp. Wordpress software (which I use for this blog), which makes the drudgery of html, php, sql, etc magically disappear to the background.

You’ll see some changes to the sidebar, including recent comments, recent posts, and more significantly, a new type of post called “asides”.  This will enable me to pass along interesting things I see but only have a few things to say about them, without the need for a full post or distracting from the longer things I write.

Also, I am going to try and hit a publishing schedule of 3 times a week on the main posts, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.  Expect something mid-morning on those days.  A predictable feed of content will help build an audience as I continue to pursue this experiment.

Thanks again for taking the time to read this space.

Anti-Catholic Obsessions & West Texas Idolatry

Monday, January 29th, 2007

As I visited some websites recently in my research on the megachurch movement, I was struck by the anti-Catholic off-topic obsession of some of the authors. Instead of sticking to the meat of the issue (and some of their research is quite good), they inevitably go off on tangents about how the doctrinal-watering-down and brainless ecumenicism of Warren, Hybels and company is really just a secret plot to undo the Reformation and unite us all back into the Catholic Church. So whatever credibility they build up with hard evidence, they destroy by subsequent peddling of conspiracy theories.

I believe there’s a unity of the Church through Christ that transcends denominational boundaries (inclusive of many Catholics), but that of course doesn’t mean that we should get rid of the boundaries, any more than the fact that Americans and Mexicans are both human beings means that there ought not be a border. And honest, conservative Catholics would agree with this. Somebody like Mel Gibson or Bill Donahue of the Catholic League really believes the doctrines of their church- and those doctrines are completely incompatible with an honest conservative Protestant. However, since both groups of respective conservatives, Catholic and Protestant, are secure in their conflicting beliefs, they can agree to disagree- and then, most importantly, work together in coalitions on other important issues they have in common- for example, opposition to abortion or the spread of Islam. The dangerous sort of ecumenism doesn’t come from true Catholics and true Protestants, but from the squishy liberal “Fruit Loops” in each group. The liberals, never really taking doctrine all that seriously anyway, are more than willing to make compromises on principle so they can sit around the fire together and sing “Kum-ba-ya” in some sort of false feel-good unity. It’s all driven by emotions for them anyway, not belief. We don’t have a Catholic, Methodist, Presbyterian, etc denominational problem- we have a liberal problem.

That said, and to partially agree with my conspiracy-theory promoting brethren, I think it’s very important to talk about which Catholics. Conservative English Catholics (like Tolkien and Lewis) and conservative American Catholics (for example, those at Chronicles Magazine) can come very close to sounding like conservative Protestants at times, in terms of having a deep appreciation for Scripture and taking their faith seriously in terms of their personal behavior. Their Catholicism is based on sincere beliefs built on mostly sound reasoning. However, with our immigration policies, we are importing a quite different strain of Catholicism from Latin America. This is a Catholicism of outright idolatry and tolerance of hypocrisy (adultery, stealing, drug dealing, bribery, corruption, etc) as long as the outward ordinances of the Church are performed. In other words, a Catholicism less like what resulted from the counter-Reformation (where the Catholic Church fixed many of the problems leading to the Reformation) and more like the corrupt idolatry that led Luther to lead a revolution.

This news story about the Virgin Mary in a grocery store freezer in West Texas demonstrates quite aptly the nature of the Latin American Catholicism we are importing – be sure to watch the video for full effect.

The Digital Archive and Our Impact on Our Family’s Future

Thursday, January 25th, 2007

I recently helped my wife transition our family’s digital photos and movies from ad-hoc directories spread across several computers into a unified library on her Mac’s excellent iPhoto software. While I still find the Apple operating system a bit awkward (it’s prettier, more stable, easier-to-use and more secure than Windows for the average user, but it doesn’t offer any really breakthrough additional functionality and taxes me with my Windows-optimized computer instincts), the real treat of owning a Mac is Apple’s software. It’s well-designed and it works. Particularly interesting was the scrolling function when looking at the entire library. As you scroll down chronologically, the software superimposes the month and year over your screen. I was a bit taken aback as I started scrolling down- we have so many photos over only six short years of time as a couple. At last count, I think there are 12.8 gigabytes worth of photo and video (we take short video snapshots with our digital camera that I edit into an annual DVD as an alternative to the awkward omnipresence of a video camera, whose footage is never watched).

I think it works out to about 3000 total photos. They are stored digitally, will never degrade, and will look as good 500 years from now as they do today.

If I did my best, I might be able to find 50-100 photos total of any of my grandparents (3 of whom are passed away). The tiny bit of video is on 20-year-old degrading VHS tapes that badly need to be archived. In essence, I have a few pictures, a bit of video, fading memories. That’s it.

For every child born today, it will be far different. When my second child is a great-grandmother, maybe 50 years after I have passed away, she will have a perfect digital copy of video taken moments after her birth- and perfect archives of her father and mother. How they talked. What they looked like. Their mannerisms and the silly things said to them when they were a child.

But the implications are far more significant than just emotional connections to dead relatives that can be recalled upon command. Perhaps a bit of historical context on this subject:

In medieval England, one of the goals of the aristocracy was to preserve the unity of family wealth over time. Many of them left wills that essentially said “my oldest son inherits all of my wealth; he may do anything he wishes with the income generated from it, but may not deplete one penny of principal or sell one acre of land.” Over time, land and money became tied up in a few hands as the “dead hand” of the past restricted the living from doing what they wished with their estates. The law eventually recognized this problem and created a legal principle called the “rule against perpetuities”. The rule essentially states that for a contract or will to be valid it must be provable that it will terminate within 21 years after the death of someone alive at the time of its origination. So for example, an older British patriarch could only tie up property for the maximum of the lifetime of any one person alive at the time of his death plus twenty one years. Still a lot of time, but it freed up a lot of land and removed the oppressive regulations of long-dead ancestors.

The efforts of these aristocrats to control the future dealings of their heirs illustrate the natural desire of any father or mother to influence what comes after them. Many of them wrote long, detailed letters concerning life to their children, for example the very popular (in the 1800’s) writings of Lord Chesterton to his son or Robert E. Lee’s affectionate letters to his children, first published in the early 1900’s.

I believe our opportunity for such influence is many times that of our ancestors. Thanks to digital technology, our photos and videos will survive indefinitely, and our descendents can have the opportunity to feel like they really know us. Feeling like they know us as people, they are more apt to take our ideas seriously, even those passed down in written form.

Recently I listened to Vision Forum’s Entrepreneurial Bootcamp CD’s (as an aside, they were excellent, with more practical business content than the typical secular “think positive” business cow pattie seminar; I don’t think I ever understood the whole venture capital build-it-to-sell-it process until I heard one of the guys speak, as I’m more naturally interested in building cash cows to have and to hold than capturing market share as bait for a potential buyout). One of the more, shall we say, “intense” speakers shared that he had a 200-year plan for his family- actually written out! Now that may sound really strange, but he remarked that in his lifetime since he wrote the plan, 20% of 200 years will have passed.

To our hyper-individualistic culture this sounds insane- the typical parent is just looking to get the kid out of the house and self-supporting. But to most people in healthy cultures (including our own before not too long ago), long-range planning is a desirable goal. One of the reasons the Japanese outperform us in many areas is their extreme long-term perspective- Sony and Toyota are reported to have business plans looking up to 500 years into the future! Meanwhile, GM is studying how to save $1 on a piece of plastic to boost earnings next quarter.

So we shouldn’t be shocked or ridicule someone with a long-range plan, but rather consider how such a plan, enabled by the priceless technological gifts of our time, fits into OUR vision for OUR family. I also think we have to start thinking tribally, in terms of our extended future kinship network, not only our immediate nuclear family.

These thoughts are very much in-process, but I will briefly summarize some of the opportunities available:

1. A longer lifespan will enable more long-term-oriented thinking for our families, and more impact on grandchildren. One of the challenges affecting any successful parent is a statistical demographic reality called regression to the mean. Even if a husband and wife are both above-average in ability, the children of such a union will tend to regress back towards the population mean (or IQ=100 for European peoples); the parental IQ is the best indicator of the highly heritable trait of general intelligence (i.e. smarter parents have smarter kids), but like height or any other inherited trait, extreme values tend to get smoothed back down to the average. If you’re smarter than average for your population group, your children will tend to, on average, regress down to the mean (this is a statistically probabilistic statement- it is certainly possible to have all children be smarter, in fact, if you have enough children, it becomes likely that at least one will be smarter). Likewise, those below the average will have children who regress back up to it. Thankfully, IQ is not nearly as important as moral and spiritual development (though, as The Bell Curve demonstrates, they do correlate together in a rather Calvinistic way), but if we want to have an extended kinship network with a visible leader (as committees are the worst way to govern anything), especially when we’re talking about running a continuing family business, we want this person to be at least as talented as the previous generation. The Italians have a word for this concept, called virtu’, that combines the traits of high intelligence, high moral standards and an action-oriented mindset. We want a leader for our extended family or business who is smart (practically smart, not primarily a self-absorbed geeky intelligence), highly moral (as fairness is the only way to ensure the long-term unity and stability of the extended family unit) and a man of action. In other words, someone with the essential virtu’. The only solution to finding this leader is to cast a wide net by having lots of children and grandchildren. The long lifespans afforded by current medicine (which is worlds better than it was even twenty years ago at helping us maintain a higher quality of life) can enable us to not only have more a of multigenerational impact on our grandchildren, but also to see the track record of performance of our children and grandchildren over a longer period of time, which can give greater peace of mind when the time comes to pass the baton to a new leader of the extended family.

2. We are entering a new era of fathers taking responsibility for leadership of their families; could this be formalized? I’ve considered the idea of a “Family Constitution”, some sort of internal document delineating reasonable objective standards of behavior that define who we are, to minimize the “drift” of future generations. Of course it would be unenforceable, but so are Biblical standards of behavior in our times- but no one would say the Bible has no impact.

3. On issues that we care about (say a certain perspective on history, or a theological opinion not compatible with the spirit of our age), we could make simple videos explaining our position to our children and grandchildren. Imagine how difficult it would be for the Supreme Court to twist the opinions of the Founding Fathers if there had been C-SPAN at the Constitutional Convention! In the same way, a video can provide concrete evidence of your opinion, not watered down or compromised in any way. This can help your descendants resist any future liberalizing influences.

These are just a few fairly random thoughts at this point. But the possibilities are endless, for good and evil, with the technological revolution we are experiencing.

Happy 200th Birthday, Robert E. Lee

Friday, January 19th, 2007

It’s a crime that January 19, 2007, the 200th anniversary of Robert E. Lee’s birth, will pass almost unnoticed across the country and most tragically, among most Southerners. To quote Dabney, the efforts of Southern constitutional constructionists who gave their lives to prevent the tyranny of the federal government that continues to this day must seem, to the depraved post-modern mind, “as completely out-of-date to them as the ribs of Noah’s ark, bleaching amidst the eternal snows of Ararat, to his posterity, when engaged in building the Tower of Babel.”

I have in preparation a much longer post discussing my recent interest in literature of the War Between the States, but suffice it to say that I believe the essential feature of the Confederacy to be its anti-modern Christian agrarian basis of society. And that this basis was so offensive to the coming Spirit of the Age that she had to be murdered- not murdered because she was weak (as a small, weak Christian state could have been tolerated as a sort of preserved specimen), but precisely because she was strong. And that she came so close against such odds is a testament to the men who led her- unlike the North, whose leaders took the coward’s way out by buying a substitute, the South’s aristocracy was willing to pay in their own blood for their freedom; multi-millionaires raised their sword and led the sons of poor farmers into the very gates of hell (could anyone imagine Bill Gates leading men into battle?). Such a romantic anachronism, recalling the glorious warrior-kings of old, was an affront to the ugly standards of modernity.

This romanticism of the Confederate cause gave her many admirers abroad, particularly among the conservatives of England, who were too few in number at this point to mount any real resistance to modernity, but who vicariously gloried in this final, almost-successful rebellion of the old order against the new. These English aristocrats were never able to provide much beyond moral support in the war.

The following is a dedication of an 1865 English translation of The Odyssey by English poet Philip Stanhope Worsley, as told by Robert E. Lee’s son, including Lee’s reply to the poet:

Among the many tokens of respect and admiration, love,and sympathy which my father received from all over the world, therewas one that touched him deeply. It was a “Translation of Homer’s Iliad by Philip Stanhope Worsley, Fellow of Corpus Christi College,Oxford, England,” which the talented young poet and author sent him, through the General’s nephew, Mr. Edward Lee Childe, of Paris, a special friend of Mr. Worsley. I copy the latter’s letter to Mr. Childe, as it shows some of the motives influencing him in the dedication of his work:

“My Dear Friend:

You will allow me in dedicating this work to you,to offer it at the same time as a poor yet not altogether unmeaning tribute of my reverence for your brave and illustrious uncle, General Lee. He is the hero, like Hector of the Iliad, of the most glorious cause for which men fight, and some of the grandest passages in the poem come to me with yet more affecting power when I remember his lofty character and undeserved misfortunes. The great names that your country has bequeathed from its four lurid years of national life as examples to mankind can never be forgotten, and among these none will be more honoured, while history endures, by all true hearers, than that of your noble relative. I need not say more, for I know you must be aware how much I feel the honour of associating my work, however indirectly, with one whose goodness and genius are alike so admirable. Accept this token of my deepest sympathy and regard, and believe me,

“Ever most sincerely yours,

“P. S. Worsley.”

On the fly-leaf of the volume he sent my father was written the following beautiful inscription:

“To General Lee,
The most stainless of living commanders
and, except in fortune, the greatest,
this volume is presented
with the writer’s earnest sympathy
and respectful admiration
‘… oios yap epveto Idiov Ektwp.’

Iliad VI–403,”

and just beneath, by the same hand, the following beautiful verses:

“The grand old bard that never dies,
Receive him in our English tongue!
I send thee, but with weeping eyes,
The story that he sung.

“Thy Troy is fallen,–thy dear land
Is marred beneath the spoiler’s heel–
I cannot trust my trembling hand
To write the things I feel.

“Ah, realm of tears!–but let her bear
This blazon to the end of time:
No nation rose so white and fair,
None fell so pure of crime.

“The widow’s moan, the orphan’s wail,
Come round thee; but in truth be strong!
Eternal Right, though all else fail,
Can never be made Wrong.

“An Angel’s heart, an angel’s mouth,
Not Homer’s, could alone for me
Hymn well the great Confederate South–
Virginia first, and LEE.

“P. S. W.”

His letter of thanks…shows very plainly how much he was pleased:

“Lexington, Virginia, February 10, 1866.

“Mr. P. S. Worsley.

“My Dear Sir: I have received the copy of your translation of the Iliad which you so kindly presented to me. Its perusal has been my evening’s recreation, and I have never more enjoyed the beauty and grandeur of the poem than as recited by you. The translation is as truthful as powerful, and faithfully represents the imagery and rhythm of the bold original. The undeserved compliment in prose and verse, on the first leaves of the volume, I received as your tribute to the merit of my countrymen, who struggled for constitutional government.

“With great respect,

“Your obedient servant,

“R. E. Lee.”

Kipling’s Natural Theology

Thursday, January 18th, 2007

As promised in a recent post, here begins a series of poetry and prose from our past. Now, I must say, my tastes in poetry are quite simple- I like clever pieces that rhyme. Rudyard Kipling, known to us best for his novel The Jungle Book, is among the most enjoyable poets of the past. His poem “Natural Theology” deals handily with people’s tendency to blame God for their self-afflicted problems.

Natural Theology

by Rudyard Kipling

Primitive

I ate my fill of a whale that died
And stranded after a month at sea. . . .
There is a pain in my inside.
Why have the Gods afflicted me?
Ow! I am purged till I am a wraith!
Wow! I am sick till I cannot see!
What is the sense of Religion and Faith :
Look how the Gods have afflicted me!

Pagan

How can the skin of rat or mouse hold
Anything more than a harmless flea?. . .
The burning plague has taken my household.
Why have my Gods afflicted me?
All my kith and kin are deceased,
Though they were as good as good could be,
I will out and batter the family priest,
Because my Gods have afflicted me!

Medieval

My privy and well drain into each other
After the custom of Christendie. . . .
Fevers and fluxes are wasting my mother.
Why has the Lord afflicted me?
The Saints are helpless for all I offer–
So are the clergy I used to fee.
Henceforward I keep my cash in my coffer,
Because the Lord has afflicted me.

Material

I run eight hundred hens to the acre
They die by dozens mysteriously. . . .
I am more than doubtful concerning my Maker,
Why has the Lord afflicted me?
What a return for all my endeavour–
Not to mention the L. S. D!
I am an atheist now and for ever,
Because this God has afflicted me!

Progressive

Money spent on an Army or Fleet
Is homicidal lunacy. . . .
My son has been killed in the Mons retreat,
Why is the Lord afflicting me?
Why are murder, pillage and arson
And rape allowed by the Deity?
I will write to the Times, deriding our parson
Because my God has afflicted me.

Chorus

We had a kettle: we let it leak:
Our not repairing it made it worse.
We haven’t had any tea for a week. . .
The bottom is out of the Universe!

Conclusion

This was none of the good Lord’s pleasure,
For the Spirit He breathed in Man is free;
But what comes after is measure for measure,
And not a God that afflicteth thee.
As was the sowing so the reaping
Is now and evermore shall be.
Thou art delivered to thine own keeping.
Only Thyself hath afflicted thee!

What Can Bill Clinton’s Spiritual Adviser Teach You About Evangelism?

Saturday, January 13th, 2007

I’m amazed how incredibly uninformed I seem to be regarding the who’s who of the “church growth” movement. I grew up in churches in close proximity to the New Orleans Theological Seminary, and the pastors it produced tended to be of the old-time religion variety- you know, repent of your sin, turn to Jesus, “churchy” kind of stuff not very relevant to the Brave New World.

Anyway, apparently there’s this guy named Bill Hybels who was doing Rick Warren before Rick Warren was cool, head of a mega-church called Willow Creek in Illinois. Well, Warren went from retail to wholesale with the Purpose Driven Life, and so I guess Hybels is doing the same thing with a new series on evangelism.

He’s described as an “optimist” who wants to overcome the spiritual baggage of all those backwards Baptists who make hay over minor things like the lives of unborn children, instead of concentrating on what’s really important, like social gospel wealth redistribution schemes.

And whatdoya know- he’s Bill Clinton’s spiritual adviser:

Mr Hybels’s optimism is perhaps best illustrated by his role as Bill Clinton’s spiritual adviser throughout his Monica Lewinsky-tainted eight years in the White House. Mr Clinton returned the favour by turning up at the church in 2000 to tell the congregation that his spiritual health was a “work in progress”.

And it continues, according to Touchstone Magazine:

At the end, according to the Tribune, Hybels and Clinton stood before the crowd; Hybels then “put his arm on the president’s shoulder and prayed: ‘Thank you, God, that you wired him up the way you did’.”

Clinton left to a standing ovation of 4,500 Christian leaders. (Another 6,000 watched by satellite.)

Now maybe I’m old-fashioned, but anyone who cozies up to a baby-killing sexual predator like Clinton and provides him a quasi-Christian forum to make his weaseley “apology” might need to repeat Evangelism 101 in seminary. But, by today’s standards, like a CEO who bankrupts a corporation, it just means he has “experience”- he can write a book and call himself an expert!

And, of course, I would not leave you without the big picture. I cannot say it better than the Touchstone article, as they describe the Oprahfication of an American church who has rejected its heritage and chases after vanity:

Is a certain segment of Evangelicalism, lacking the weight of history and gravity of tradition and generally ineffective in shaping political and cultural forms, so self-consciously aware of its junior status in the culture, of its youth and lack of sophistication, that it is susceptible to seduction? Certain Evangelicals have been mesmerized by a Southern Baptist, Bible-toting American president who exhibits none of the moral earnestness of real Southern Baptists (or many other Evangelical Christians for that matter) but who is willing to direct his approving celebrity gaze in their direction, and speak the language—in some circles the new and improved Christian language—not of sin and repentance but of therapy and feelings.

Yep, that about sums it up.

You Mean We’re Not All the Same?

Friday, January 12th, 2007

The problem with science and ideologies is that science every now and then drops a “data bomb” on man’s vain efforts to simplify God’s Creation. Both evolutionists and creationists have been guilty of this to some degree.

Evolutionists in the post-WWII era have maintained that, while evolution has great implications for the origin of life and for differences between and among a species, there are very little differences between the varieties of man, and all of these differences are at most superficial. These latter conclusions are politically convenient for globalist multicultural interests, and any scientist who deviates from the “party line” on this is punished professionally.

Some prominent Creationists, pathetically eager to score points with the liberal equalitarian zeitgeist of the contemporary world, proudly proclaim their belief in man’s literal equality (as opposed to the Biblically supported concept of mere legal equality before God). They hope to claim a politically correct moral high ground over early evolutionists’ beliefs concerning racial differences. In summary, these creationists promote their historically anomalous liberal interpretations of the Bible to produce various specious arguments that sum up to “Darwin=Hitler”. In reality, Darwin merely provided a theory of a naturalistic process to explain certain empirical observations. The observations themselves stand, but the new-age Creationists try to deny the very observations, rather than restricting themselves as they should to denying the atheistic tendencies of the theory of evolution. Any evil resulting from evolution is due to its denial of God. The observations it seeks to explain, the fact that man is a highly diverse creation, that we’re not all the same, are key to providing a rational argument against globalism.

By attacking dead scientists by association with what dead tyrants did with their theories, they do nothing but score cheap political points against their evolutionist opponents (who will simply deny the validity of the tyrants’ abuses), while surrendering the key ideological battles to the very real threat of equalitarian globalism. If we’re really all the same, then why not have one-world government?

Well, a new “data bomb” tends to show them both to be wrong. It turns out that there’s an entire additional “encryption layer” of information on top of the double helix of DNA, increasing the information density of God’s “organic hard drives” by an order of magnitude greater than we previously thought. This means that A) man is 400% less related to the chimpanzee genetically than we previously thought (94% versus 98.5%, whether you view this as evolution or just God reusing the same blueprints) and B) the varieties of man are 1000% less related to each other (99% versus 99.9%) than previously thought.

This is a huge discovery in genetics. That means there’s up to 1/6 the difference between men as there is between man and chimpanzee. And with this additional information density encoded into DNA, it certainly makes spontaneous evolution a much greater leap of logic.

It looks like God created us, and He created us with a wide variety of difference, not all necessarily superficial. And no amount of equalitarian ideological wishful thinking can change that, whether of the evolutionary atheist or new-age Creationist variety.

Christianity and Culture, Part Four: Practical Suggestions

Sunday, January 7th, 2007

This series has discussed the legitimacy, primacy, biological reality and even Scriptural authority for a positive loyalty and preference for the ethnocultural group in which God in His Sovereignty has placed us. As Americans, our loyalty is not to a mere “American creed” or set of abstract principles theoretically extendable to all mankind, but rather to the actual, physical American people as they existed historically and their descendents today. Our heritage as Americans is not due to our Constitution (Liberia has an almost identical Constitution, but it’s not somewhere you would want to live) but rather due to our innate biocultural capabilities combined with a historical legacy as a colony of 17th century England and the attendant conservatism of a remote colony in preserving the virtues of that era, certainly not perfect but much superior in any moral or religious measure to our current age.

Yet many of us are hesitant to express this loyalty. Why? Because of an oppressive force generally known as “political correctness”. Hispanic groups can tell us to “go back to Europe” with no media backlash. Black Muslims like Louis Farrakhan claim European peoples are the invention of a black mad scientist sequestered on a remote island who created “blue-eyed devils” as the tools of Satan; and yet, it is only Farrakhan’s wacky theories about Jews that get media attention, while his anti-European views are tolerated. But let our people ask the government to merely enforce its own laws to prevent an alien invasion and their eventual displacement, and the media censors immediately begin the predictable cry of “racist, bigot, xenophobe”. Why the double standard?

Perhaps Moses said it best, in a speech Charlton Heston gave in 1997 to the Free Congress Foundation:

I have come to realize that a cultural war is raging across our land… storming our values, assaulting our freedoms, killing our self-confidence in who we are and what we believe, where we come from.

How many of you here own a gun? A show of hands?

How many own two or more guns?

Thank you. I wonder—how many of you in this room own guns but chose not to raise your hand?

How many of you considered revealing your conviction about a constitutional right, but then thought better of it?

Then you are a victim of the cultural war. You are a casualty of the cultural warfare being waged against traditional American freedom of beliefs and ideas. Now maybe you don’t care one way or the other about owning a gun. But I could’ve asked for a show of hands on Pentecostal Christians, or pro-lifers, or right-to-workers, or Promise Keepers, or school voucher-ers, and the result would be the same. What if the same question were asked at your PTA meeting? Would you raise your hand if Dan Rather were in the back of the room there with a film crew?

See? Good. Still, if you didn’t, you have been assaulted and robbed of the courage of your convictions. Your pride in who you are, and what you believe, has been ridiculed, ransacked, plundered. It may be a war without bullet or bloodshed, but with just as much liberty lost: You and your country are less free.

And you are not inconsequential people! You in this room, whom many would say are among the most powerful people on earth, you are shamed into silence! Because you embrace a view at odds with the cultural warlords. If that is the outcome of cultural war, and you are the victims, I can only ask the gravely obvious question: What’ll become of the right itself? Or other rights not deemed acceptable by the thought police? What other truth in your heart will you disavow with your hand?

I remember when European Jews feared to admit their faith. The Nazis forced them to wear six-pointed yellow stars sewn on their chests as identity badges. It worked. So—what color star will they pin on our coats? How will the self-styled elite tag us? There may not be a Gestapo officer on every street corner yet, but the influence on our culture is just as pervasive.

Now, I am not really here to talk about the Second Amendment or the NRA, but the gun issue clearly brings into focus the war that’s going on.

Rank-and-file Americans wake up every morning, increasingly bewildered and confused at why their views make them lesser citizens. After enough breakfast-table TV promos hyping tattooed sex-slaves on the next Rikki Lake show, enough gun-glutted movies and tabloid talk shows, enough revisionist history books and prime-time ridicule of religion, enough of the TV anchor who cocks her pretty head, clucks her tongue and sighs about guns causing crime and finally the message gets through: Heaven help the God-fearing, law-abiding, Caucasian, middle class, Protestant, or—even worse—Evangelical Christian, Midwest, or Southern, or—even worse—rural, apparently straight, or—even worse—admittedly heterosexual, gun-owning or—even worse—NRA-card-carrying, average working stiff, or—even worse—male working stiff, because not only don’t you count, you’re a downright obstacle to social progress. Your tax dollars may be just as delightfully green as you hand them over, but your voice requires a lower decibel level, your opinion is less enlightened, your media access is insignificant, and frankly mister, you need to wake up, wise up and learn a little something about your new America…in fact, why don’t you just sit down and shut up?

That’s why you don’t raise your hand. That’s how cultural war works. And you are losing.

Although my years are long, I was not on hand to help pen the Bill of Rights. And popular assumptions aside, the same goes for the Ten Commandments. Yet as an American and as a man who believes in God’s almighty power, I treasure both.

The Constitution was handed down to guide us by a bunch of those wise old dead white guys who invented this country. Now, some flinch when I say that. Why? It’s true…they were white guys. So were most of the guys who died in Lincoln’s name opposing slavery in the 1860s. So why should I be ashamed of white guys? Why is “Hispanic pride” or “black pride” a good thing, while “white pride” conjures up shaved heads and white hoods? Why was the Million Man March on Washington celebrated in the media as progress, while the Promise Keepers March on Washington was greeted with suspicion and ridicule? I’ll tell you why: Cultural warfare.

Americans should not have to go to war every morning for their values. They already go to war for their families. They fight to hold down a job, raise responsible kids, make their payments, keep gas in the car, put food on the table and clothes on their backs, and still save a little for their final days in dignity. They prefer the America they built – where you could pray without feeling naive, love without being kinky, sing without profanity, be white without feeling guilty, own a gun without shame, and raise your hand without apology. They are the critical masses who find themselves under siege and are long for you to get some guts, stand on principle and lead them to victory in this cultural war.

Now all this sounds a little Mosaic, the punch-line of my sermon is as elementary as the Golden Rule. In a cultural war, triumph belongs to those who arm themselves with pride in who they are and then do the right thing. Not the most expedient thing, not the politically correct thing, not what’ll sell, but the right thing.

As an aside, I find it interesting that Heston brings up the Promise Keepers march on Washington. Indeed it was ridiculed by the media, in cruel ways, stereotyping a gathering of Christian men as just a bunch of dorky white guys wanting to beat their wives into submission. While I have my own reservations about Promise Keepers leadership that I won’t go into here, the instincts of the participants are commendable: men wanting to turn their hearts towards home. I remember watching the march on C-SPAN, and there was one particular part that turned my stomach: a bizarre ritual of “racial reconciliation” that involved a white guy on his knees, surrounded by representatives of other races (complete with an American Indian in full headdress, looking more like The Village People than any Indian you see in real life these days) who were standing around him, while the white guy prayed for God’s forgiveness for the sins of his race in America against Hispanics, Indians and African Americans. But it was the white guy and the white guy only who prayed for forgiveness- no prayer of forgiveness for Mexican slaughters of Anglos at Goliad and the Alamo, no prayer of forgiveness for the thousands of women and children mercilessly murdered by American Indians, and no prayer of forgiveness for African Americans’ disproportionate interracial crime rates. I will restrain myself from describing the myriad theological problems with the whole episode.

This incident is exactly the phenomenon Heston hit on- the cloud of oppression where we want to please the media and the cultural elites with apologies for who we are. And yet, what did this ritual buy the Promise Keepers leadership, who were obviously nervous about the fact that their openly multiracial group overwhelmingly consisted of white men? It only bought them contempt from the media. We must realize that our enemies can never be placated or pleased- but like a battered woman in a co-dependent relationship, Promise Keepers keeps on believing they can somehow justify themselves by trying to please the media.

In his speech, Moses was describing the cultural war, but specifically a psychological war, the dirtiest kind of war that deprives men and women of the sanctity of their own thoughts and opinions. And there we see the practical task before us: Like a Twelve-Step Program, we must admit and recognize that we are victims of this war, seek to rehabilitate ourselves from its effect, and most importantly, shield our children from it in their formative years and give them a cultural immune system that will enable them to fight off psychological pathogens once they enter the outside world on their own.

Once freed from the psychological disease of political correctness, the ethnocultural loyalties I advocate will occur naturally, or at least can be taught and internalized with little resistance as a logical extension of the family itself.

So, without further ado:

Tom’s Practical Suggestions for Recovering Victims of Political Correctness to Heal Psychological Wounds and Break the Cycle of Guilt and Oppression for Your Children

1. The media’s main distribution vehicle for mass-consumed politically correct propaganda is television. Turn off the TV. Cancel the cable. Your cable bill sends about 25 to 50 cents per month to every channel on the dial, whether you watch it or not. So you’re subsidizing the filth whether you want to or not. There’s not a whole lot of downside to getting rid of cable once you get over withdrawals: higher quality family time without the tube on all the time (I’ve noticed some people who mute the TV and leave it on all the time, like a security blanket or something), higher SAT scores for your kids since they’ll have to read for entertainment, and more sex. Seriously, studies have shown that TV’s in the bedroom reduce sex frequency between husbands and wives.

2. Ok, I realize most of you won’t implement #1. I’m a hypocrite as well on it, but I thought I’d throw it out there as an ideal. Here’s what we did: we cancelled our cable in 2005. We signed up with Dish Network; there’s even a “family friendly” package that is $20 a month (though not all of the channels, like Nickelodeon, are necessarily healthy). We also got a DVR, where we record shows like a TIVO. Second, and most importantly, we put the Dish Netword receiver on one and only one TV: the one right in front of our exercise equipment. In our house, you must at least be building your temple while you rot your mind.

3. Ok, so maybe #2 is not something you want to do either. At least do the following. Get a DVR, whether Dish or Tivo or whatever. I think a lot of our consumption of unhealthy propaganda is due to mindless viewing of whatever’s on. Now, most people don’t want to watch propaganda, but they will watch it if it’s the best thing on at any given time. A Tivo or digital video recorder allows you to record hours and hours of relatively harmless content (like my wife’s decorating shows, or my shows about “Modern Marvels”, exciting documentaries about concrete, plastic, metal and the like). My recorder has more shows of pretty harmless content than my wife or I could ever watch. In addition, you can skip commercials pretty easily, which will reduce your credit card bill by reducing your exposure to want-inducing messages of materialism (believe me, advertising works- I spend a lot of money on it, and not for my health). Now remember, I said the content is relatively harmless, but it’s not edifying either. So instead of consuming media toxins, you are now consuming the equivalent of table sugar, not healthy for sure, but not harmful in moderation. Even some of the “harmless” content will have trace levels of toxin- for example, a documentary about Texas had the obligatory politically correct hand-wringing about slavery. At least in that situation, with a DVR, you can hit the pause button, explain to your children the problem with what they just heard, and start again. If we talk back to our TV’s in our children’s prescence, the damage is mitigated; in fact, being a critical consumer of media content is an important skill to teach to our children.

4. Never, ever let your children watch content from television without your supervision. Even with a DVR, your children may be tempted to watch the commercials. And for goodness sake, don’t let them watch “children’s” programming. Media mogul Sumner Redstone, born Murray Rothstein, owns Viacom, which in turn owns Cartoon Network, Nickelodeon and MTV. Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network are designed to produce future consumers of MTV. Do not be so gullible as to trust an anti-Christian corporation to determine appropriate media content for your children. Your preferred medium for children’s content should be the DVD, where you are in absolute control of a closed circuit on the content. There’s no way they’re going to see a Spongebob commercial while watching Veggietales.

5. Build an extensive DVD collection of healthy content and share your content with others (I leave the means for the latter deliberately vague). I will soon start a project of building a list of appropriate DVD’s on this site.

6. Much of the “science” of psychology is actually pseudoscience. However, there is one psychological therapy technique that is almost universally useful: exposure therapy for curing phobias. If someone is afraid of snakes, they can be cured by handling snakes, almost guaranteed. Similarly, political correctness has made us afraid of our past as a people and culture. We need to dig around in the past, particularly in those areas deemed “forbidden” and “evil” by the media, to discover the truth. As a Southerner, this means, for example, I need to know everything I can about The War Between the States, Reconstruction and the Redemption (i.e. the overthrow of the Reconstruction governments) that I can, from original sources, or at least older sources. I need to know the past as it was, from the people who lived in it, and not from self-appointed censors in our current age.

7. We need a general exposure to our civilization’s heritage. Read good literature, listen to good classical music, and enjoy poetry from the past when poems were real art instead of self-indulgent raw feeds of randomness and obscenity from some idiot’s subconscious.

8. In regards to #6 and #7, it is apparent that we must read to accomplish these things. In music and reading, there is a somewhat painful process of stretching the mind that is required before finer things can be appreciated. It’s worth it. Once you begin to enjoy the “higher bandwidth” cultural offerings of our past, you’ll feel like something’s missing in mass-marketed media. But it does take some effort to read. I will also start media lists of music and books on this site. My own experience reading good books is fairly recent, so I can offer some suggestions.

9. In the blog format, one experiential thing I can do for my audience appropriate to the blogging medium to help with #6 and #7 is featuring poetry and prose excerpts from the past. The Internet is perfect for short-format poems- I will begin a weekly poem and prose feature soon, with poems and excerpts from important historical works that will help recovering victims of political correctness.

10. If you’re homeschooling your children, be careful with your curriculum. As anything you pick will be superior to most private and public schools, do not let that comfort blind you to the opportunity cost if a curriculum relies on a pre-digested textbook format to teach history, music, art and the like. I notice some of the large homeschool curriculum sources making overtures to multiculturalism, which is almost as destructive in a Christian context as a secular one. We should prefer a curriculum that is heavy on original sources instead of “interpretation” in a textbook written under the political pressure of our time. Older textbooks are preferable to newer ones. I believe our children have a lot of “heavy lifting” to do in restoring our civilization, and only a fully confident worldview in their culture, people, faith and family will give them the intestinal fortitude to do whatever is necessary in the face of our politically correct opposition.

I’m sure there are more suggestions than these, but I will stop at ten and discuss additional ideas in additional posts.